mbox series

[bug#64225,0/9] Adding unrelated texlive packages

Message ID 01020188e2f3fd36-4ee3fab7-1cb8-4e4c-b955-c0096f51d58b-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com
Headers show
Series Adding unrelated texlive packages | expand

Message

reza June 22, 2023, 11:53 a.m. UTC 
This patch set adds a number of unrelated texlive packages.  I tested them on
my own channel for several months now and I encountered no issues.

Reza Housseini (9):
  gnu: Add texlive-filehook.
  gnu: Add texlive-svg.
  gnu: Add texlive-smartdiagram.
  gnu: Add texlive-lualatex-math.
  gnu: Add texlive-dtk.
  gnu: Add texlive-transparent.
  gnu: Add texlive-libertinus.
  gnu: Add texlive-pgfplots.
  gnu: Add texlive-luatex85.

 gnu/packages/tex.scm | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 231 insertions(+)


base-commit: bb09f3ac002a4f34177d42fd3ea0332f4b7fe7a6

Comments

Nicolas Goaziou June 22, 2023, 5:08 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hello,

reza via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes:

> This patch set adds a number of unrelated texlive packages.  I tested them on
> my own channel for several months now and I encountered no issues.

I'm in the process of rewriting the texlive build system (in the
tex-team-next branch). You may want to wait this branch to be merged.

Besides, some of the packages are already added to that branch.

Regards,
reza June 22, 2023, 8:53 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Nicolas

> I'm in the process of rewriting the texlive build system (in the
> tex-team-next branch). You may want to wait this branch to be merged.

No worries I'm not in a hurry, when do think will the rewrite land on 
master? Shall I send a patch for the tex-team-next branch?

Cheers,
Reza
Nicolas Goaziou June 23, 2023, 5:49 a.m. UTC | #3 
Hello,

reza via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Nicolas
>
>> I'm in the process of rewriting the texlive build system (in the
>> tex-team-next branch). You may want to wait this branch to be merged.
>
> No worries I'm not in a hurry, when do think will the rewrite land on 
> master?

I don't know. I still need to fix a problem on monolithic texlive, then
everything is ready. Then it will need to be built by the CI. Hopefully,
this will not be long.

> Shall I send a patch for the tex-team-next branch?

New packages do not trigger rebuilds, so this can wait for the branch to
be merged.

Regards,
Maxim Cournoyer Sept. 6, 2023, 2:27 p.m. UTC | #4 
Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> reza via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Nicolas
>>
>>> I'm in the process of rewriting the texlive build system (in the
>>> tex-team-next branch). You may want to wait this branch to be merged.
>>
>> No worries I'm not in a hurry, when do think will the rewrite land on 
>> master?

Is there still something to salvage here, or should we close it?

Thanks Reza for the contribution.
Andreas Enge Sept. 7, 2023, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #5 
Hello,

all packages except for texlive-dtk are now packaged. We do have
texlive-dtk-bibliography. Is not packaging texlive-dtk an oversight,
or is it in a non-obvious place, or is it not part of texlive?

Andreas
Nicolas Goaziou Sept. 7, 2023, 5:06 p.m. UTC | #6 
Hello,

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> all packages except for texlive-dtk are now packaged. We do have
> texlive-dtk-bibliography. Is not packaging texlive-dtk an oversight,
> or is it in a non-obvious place, or is it not part of texlive?

Unless I'm missing something, there is a `texlive-dtk' package in
"tex.scm" (starting line 81116).

Regards,
Andreas Enge Sept. 7, 2023, 6:05 p.m. UTC | #7 
Am Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:06:30PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Unless I'm missing something, there is a `texlive-dtk' package in
> "tex.scm" (starting line 81116).

Ah, sorry, little difference between my "pulled" and my "pre-inst-enved" Guix.
So closing this bug!

Andreas