[bug#68556,gnome-team,v2,16/23] gnu: Add gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-fork.
Commit Message
The NoAnnoyance “v2” project has not been ported to GNOME 44, so we switch to
a maintained fork.
* gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm (gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-fork): New variable.
Change-Id: Ic74d832020dfe3857e1abf450f5d7876cc921a28
---
gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
Comments
Am Mittwoch, dem 17.01.2024 um 23:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> The NoAnnoyance “v2” project has not been ported to GNOME 44, so we
> switch to a maintained fork.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm (gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-
> fork): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: Ic74d832020dfe3857e1abf450f5d7876cc921a28
> ---
Instead of introducing another variable and deprecating the former, it
makes sense to just update the origin, version, hash, etc.
Cheers
Le vendredi 19 janvier 2024 à 23:33 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a
écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, dem 17.01.2024 um 23:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> > The NoAnnoyance “v2” project has not been ported to GNOME 44, so we
> > switch to a maintained fork.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm (gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-
> > fork): New variable.
> >
> > Change-Id: Ic74d832020dfe3857e1abf450f5d7876cc921a28
> > ---
> Instead of introducing another variable and deprecating the former,
> it
> makes sense to just update the origin, version, hash, etc.
The version number restarts at 1 (according to extensions.gnome.org),
won’t that be a problem?
Vivien
Am Freitag, dem 19.01.2024 um 23:35 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> Le vendredi 19 janvier 2024 à 23:33 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a
> écrit :
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 17.01.2024 um 23:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
> > > The NoAnnoyance “v2” project has not been ported to GNOME 44, so
> > > we switch to a maintained fork.
> > >
> > > * gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm (gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-
> > > fork): New variable.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: Ic74d832020dfe3857e1abf450f5d7876cc921a28
> > > ---
> > Instead of introducing another variable and deprecating the former,
> > it makes sense to just update the origin, version, hash, etc.
>
> The version number restarts at 1 (according to extensions.gnome.org),
> won’t that be a problem?
I think we can count this as 16 - revision - commit, since it was
forked somewhere around there.
Cheers
@@ -946,6 +946,34 @@ (define-public gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel
(home-page "https://github.com/home-sweet-gnome/dash-to-panel/")
(license license:gpl2+)))
+(define-public gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-fork
+ (let ((revision "1")
+ (commit "5e9e6a1878d2a1d961f5d59505f15339c5b7e17e"))
+ (package
+ ;; This is the “fork” version:
+ ;; https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/6109/noannoyance-fork/
+ (name "gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance-fork")
+ (version (git-version "1" revision commit))
+ (source (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/jirkavrba/noannoyance")
+ (commit commit)))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0br9zrwvn499kh3db84hhw1kl02jpchwb5ldfp892p15vwih8yrf"))
+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))))
+ (build-system copy-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ (list
+ #:install-plan
+ #~'(("." "share/gnome-shell/extensions/noannoyance@vrba.dev"))))
+ (synopsis "Remove 'Window is ready' annotation")
+ (description "One of the many extensions that remove this message.
+It uses ES6 syntax and claims to be more actively maintained than others.")
+ (home-page "https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/2182/noannoyance/")
+ (license license:gpl2))))
+
(define-public gnome-shell-extension-noannoyance
(let ((revision "1")
(commit "b759d10fd2799bc084007fdd927b62637c3dbd2c"))