Message ID | cover.1661691694.git.h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Refresh to specific version | expand |
On 28-08-2022 15:15, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > This series now implements refreshing packages to a specific version, > see <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00061.html>. I have looked at the patches and they all seem reasonable to me (although not verified locally) -- only two nitpicks but they don't affect the semantics at all. Greetings, Maxime.
Hi! Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis: > On 28-08-2022 15:15, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > >> This series now implements refreshing packages to a specific version, >> see <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-07/msg00061.html>. > > I have looked at the patches and they all seem reasonable to me > (although not verified locally) -- only two nitpicks but they don't > affect the semantics at all. I had some further comments as you saw, but most of them are cosmetic. :-) I think this patch series is a much welcome improvement, and it’s almost ready. The one thing that needs to be sorted out is the version syntax in ‘guix refresh’, but it sounds like we should be able to do that without too much difficulty. Apologies for the delay in reviewing, and thanks for this work! Ludo’.
Am 24.09.22 um 11:48 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > The one thing that needs to be sorted out is the version syntax in ‘guix > refresh’, but it sounds like we should be able to do that without too > much difficulty. I addresses this and just submitted an updated version (of this change only). Although I'd prefer '==' two equal-signs instead of just one to be future-proof for the case we want to add other specifiers ('<', '<=', '>=', >') > Apologies for the delay in reviewing, and thanks for this work! Never mind, I was busy anyway ;-)