Message ID | 875y0einz5.fsf@troyfigiel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 0401E27BBE2; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:58:23 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 792FD27BBE9 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:58:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1rJuSA-0004Qr-OF; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:58:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rJuS9-0004Nd-OG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:58:01 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rJuS9-0005mw-Eq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:58:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rJuSA-0007cx-9m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#68171] [PATCH 0/2] Enable tests for python-h5py Resent-From: Troy Figiel <troy@troyfigiel.com> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68171.B.170402387029299@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 68171 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 68171@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170402387029299 (code B ref -1); Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:58:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2023 11:57:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rJuRx-0007cU-Jv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:57:49 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:56684) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <troy@troyfigiel.com>) id 1rJuRw-0007cI-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:57:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <troy@troyfigiel.com>) id 1rJuRp-0004Mj-Nw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:57:41 -0500 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::202]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <troy@troyfigiel.com>) id 1rJuRf-0005kJ-Jg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 06:57:41 -0500 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T2yKH2xWWz9sbF for <guix-patches@gnu.org>; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 12:57:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=troyfigiel.com; s=MBO0001; t=1704023843; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=DFglITUE83OYvMqG3M7/v+nbhI4a6h+po4L7s7CyD3g=; b=dKdxXE5KKQFxghpVJPuGQdJ15e1GMbBv8LYuxBJrsWZcLKcJftKaIv3Qnit/l/EfVdpK76 ppFE1UIYdLVEEv/RcD3Gm9MS2w27glC1rgywCiqbESFHM4bGOuWxMGcfa9AvPE/Am7srwj quxH3CRw7ECO3cCKuX/CDFbsHOsObpN1yhZgno+SXW+hnsqsNPYskL13OR6V4D8lqK25lS hZKgC+0uGKOE5lMdt8+cb5srD+zOSctcI+Cj1cCggMRW2WNkrjBRZH8eQ4BC2cidT4pJF0 JMTg4rRGg4tvvlXc8yuiiduokrbnpwazIyeMnNpG4fX4uUviTCw+Xo6pP9aIHw== From: Troy Figiel <troy@troyfigiel.com> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 12:52:32 +0100 Message-ID: <875y0einz5.fsf@troyfigiel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::202; envelope-from=troy@troyfigiel.com; helo=mout-p-202.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Enable tests for python-h5py
|
expand
|
> While writing a different package definition, I noticed python-h5py does > not have any of its tests enabled. To make the tests pass, only two new > packages needed to be added to the native inputs. > > A total of 130 dependent packages would need to be rebuilt. Although it > seems unlikely that only adding tests would break dependent builds, I > checked that locally all dependent packages that could be built before > this patch series, can still be built when these patches are applied (at > least for x86_64-linux). Agreed. Applied, thanks! Mathieu