| Message ID | 20221107230238.27936-1-sharlatanus@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | gnu: gwcs: Fix build, update to 0.18.12 | expand |
Hi Guix team! Just a gentle ping on the status of this issue. It solving build for a long chain of packages which introduced during recent staging->merge. Regards, Oleg -- … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> writes: > Just a gentle ping on the status of this issue. It solving build for a long > chain of packages which introduced during recent staging->merge. I did see this, although the information on [1] is a bit confused by the protobuf-2 problem (that's now been fixed). 1: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/59113 I think there is a significant change though, as it looks like while this fixes things on x86_64-linux, python-asdf no longer builds on other architectures due to dependencies failing to build, e.g. python-sgp4 on aarch64-linux. I'm still happy to look at merging these changes, but I thought I'd raise the non x86_64-linux failures with you. Chris
Hi Chris, Thanks for checking it. If it's posible to merge the chain for x86_64 it would be nice to have at least one working architecture. Meanwhile I'll check builds for others and open upstream issues if required. Regards, Oleg On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, 10:06 Christopher Baines, <mail@cbaines.net> wrote: > > Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> writes: > > > Just a gentle ping on the status of this issue. It solving build for a > long > > chain of packages which introduced during recent staging->merge. > > I did see this, although the information on [1] is a bit confused by the > protobuf-2 problem (that's now been fixed). > > 1: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/59113 > > I think there is a significant change though, as it looks like while > this fixes things on x86_64-linux, python-asdf no longer builds on other > architectures due to dependencies failing to build, e.g. python-sgp4 on > aarch64-linux. > > I'm still happy to look at merging these changes, but I thought I'd > raise the non x86_64-linux failures with you. > > Chris >
Hi, I've checked current version of python-asdf@2.8.3 and it has no python-sgp4 as inputs, but python-astropy does which might affect more larger scale of packages. Regards, Oleg On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 18:10, Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for checking it. > > If it's posible to merge the chain for x86_64 it would be nice to have at least one working architecture. Meanwhile I'll check builds for others and open upstream issues if required. > > > Regards, > Oleg > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, 10:06 Christopher Baines, <mail@cbaines.net> wrote: >> >> >> Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Just a gentle ping on the status of this issue. It solving build for a long >> > chain of packages which introduced during recent staging->merge. >> >> I did see this, although the information on [1] is a bit confused by the >> protobuf-2 problem (that's now been fixed). >> >> 1: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/59113 >> >> I think there is a significant change though, as it looks like while >> this fixes things on x86_64-linux, python-asdf no longer builds on other >> architectures due to dependencies failing to build, e.g. python-sgp4 on >> aarch64-linux. >> >> I'm still happy to look at merging these changes, but I thought I'd >> raise the non x86_64-linux failures with you. >> >> Chris
Hi, It might be a known issue in upstream: https://github.com/brandon-rhodes/python-sgp4/issues/107 I'll try to check what could be wrong. Regards, Oleg On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:18, Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've checked current version of python-asdf@2.8.3 and it has no > python-sgp4 as inputs, but python-astropy does which might affect more > larger scale of packages. > > Regards, > Oleg > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 18:10, Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > Thanks for checking it. > > > > If it's posible to merge the chain for x86_64 it would be nice to have at least one working architecture. Meanwhile I'll check builds for others and open upstream issues if required. > > > > > > Regards, > > Oleg > > > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, 10:06 Christopher Baines, <mail@cbaines.net> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > Just a gentle ping on the status of this issue. It solving build for a long > >> > chain of packages which introduced during recent staging->merge. > >> > >> I did see this, although the information on [1] is a bit confused by the > >> protobuf-2 problem (that's now been fixed). > >> > >> 1: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/59113 > >> > >> I think there is a significant change though, as it looks like while > >> this fixes things on x86_64-linux, python-asdf no longer builds on other > >> architectures due to dependencies failing to build, e.g. python-sgp4 on > >> aarch64-linux. > >> > >> I'm still happy to look at merging these changes, but I thought I'd > >> raise the non x86_64-linux failures with you. > >> > >> Chris > > > > -- > > … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна > найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но > совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости. -- … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for checking it. > > If it's posible to merge the chain for x86_64 it would be nice to have > at least one working architecture. Meanwhile I'll check builds for > others and open upstream issues if required. Sure, I've pushed to master now as 4d05c5fa57fe768e4d2ed760fa3aee05d72becb5 with a few minor changes. Thanks, Chris