Message ID | 20230314121451.2003-1-kraai@ftbfs.org |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 8E75D16985; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:16:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F981693E for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:16:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1pc3ZT-0004eN-KT; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:16:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pc3ZS-0004eF-K0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:16:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pc3ZS-0001rh-Bp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pc3ZS-0002I7-6x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#62184] [PATCH 0/3] Package recent Rust versions Resent-From: Matthew James Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.62184.B.16787961378767@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 62184 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 62184@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Matthew James Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org> X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16787961378767 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2023 12:15:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pc3Z3-0002HK-Bu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:15:37 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kraai@ftbfs.org>) id 1pc3Z2-0002HD-8i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:15:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <kraai@ftbfs.org>) id 1pc3Yl-0004Qk-Fl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:15:26 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::231]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <kraai@ftbfs.org>) id 1pc3Yj-0001a4-EM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:15:19 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: kraai@ftbfs.org) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAA1610001A; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:15:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftbfs.org; s=gm1; t=1678796111; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZRasqhlRYlT8kFHZeJmO4ZxrOCqz3AmaPXWhzL22/gM=; b=pMoxf9Am0x0+baQ3SurnyAUNknCBt3WJXUQsruBGKv6JsNCxca+VM5HubYe8RhVsfNUOPi Ulb8oNA6z1kitjMO3R0z2E4Tgw6+xwV80CkneMvGlP6pmiSy0DcLImMOI10QB/VgEiE5jB Sreda3xT6PLT6A6Cjeb7cMYTvC6wB7IwYA2UZmssRTWp69/eXLYGsBxtjFKiyQpZpqJk1P YDW77jfdYZ/jvB55HYxrCnVTbRgDDdyHbOybSIDbYRFRrUo0t/LYKKnbcM/qwT35VNkLQ5 vLK4KWU2b9urqsM3yzgDaU82g2WvtJYXYja3aludIpVIkD+fjysb/X1vSHyS1g== From: Matthew James Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 05:14:51 -0700 Message-Id: <20230314121451.2003-1-kraai@ftbfs.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::231; envelope-from=kraai@ftbfs.org; helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Package recent Rust versions
|
expand
|
Hi, On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 05:14, Matthew James Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org> wrote: > Package recent versions of Rust. > > Matthew James Kraai (3): > gnu: Add rust-1.66. > gnu: Add rust-1.67. > gnu: Add rust-1.68. What is the point to add these packages? Are they functional? Because as written elsewhere, rust != rust-1.60 because all the ’arguments’ field part of rust. If the aim is to upgrade the Rust ecosystem, then it appears to me better to do that in a dedicated branch instead of a work in progress directly in the branch master. Closing? Cheers, simon