Message ID | 6fa03e8699d230e078f4e40c22cd637b3c18f768.1714423249.git.mail@cbaines.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id E8BCF27BBEA; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:42:15 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB2D27BBE2 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:42:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1s1Xos-0006wn-5m; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:41:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1Xoq-0006wN-Nf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:41:48 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1Xoq-0003Dh-Dw; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:41:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1Xp4-0002uN-7K; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#70656] [PATCH python-team 3/4] gnu: python-pbr: Use git-minimal/pinned. Resent-From: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: lars@6xq.net, marius@gnu.org, me@bonfacemunyoki.com, sharlatanus@gmail.com, tanguy@bioneland.org, jgart@dismail.de, guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.70656.B70656.171442327811151@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70656 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 70656@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net>, Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org>, Munyoki Kilyungi <me@bonfacemunyoki.com>, Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com>, Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org>, jgart <jgart@dismail.de> X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net>, Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org>, Munyoki Kilyungi <me@bonfacemunyoki.com>, Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com>, Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org>, jgart <jgart@dismail.de> Received: via spool by 70656-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70656.171442327811151 (code B ref 70656); Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 70656) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2024 20:41:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58756 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1s1XoM-0002tm-EC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:41:18 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00:e000:2f8:fd4d:b5c7:13fb:3d27]:52573) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mail@cbaines.net>) id 1s1XoG-0002tM-G8 for 70656@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:41:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.132.255.10]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D755127BBE9 for <70656@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:40:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 0fc619b2 for <70656@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:40:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: <6fa03e8699d230e078f4e40c22cd637b3c18f768.1714423249.git.mail@cbaines.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <a548240971d5fcb99df6d78438c6ba46bb644677.1714423249.git.mail@cbaines.net> References: <a548240971d5fcb99df6d78438c6ba46bb644677.1714423249.git.mail@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Use git-minimal/pinned for some Python packages
|
|
Commit Message
Christopher Baines
April 29, 2024, 8:40 p.m. UTC
This helps reduce the dependencies on git, as I think it's find to build with a slightly older git, at least during periods when git-minimal/pinned needs updating. * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (python-pbr)[propagated-inputs]: Use git-minimal/pinned. Change-Id: Ib90056a1a603e06a99b5c601f9fcba7375dc24ac --- gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Hi, > This helps reduce the dependencies on git, as I think it's find to build with > a slightly older git, at least during periods when git-minimal/pinned needs > updating. this one is used on the repository cloned during build. As far as I see we use git-minimal for cloning. Do we know whether the on-disk structures of git are stable, i.e. can a clone of git version A be read by a git version B with B < A? Lars
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:14 AM Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > This helps reduce the dependencies on git, as I think it's find to build with > > a slightly older git, at least during periods when git-minimal/pinned needs > > updating. > > this one is used on the repository cloned during build. As far as I see > we use git-minimal for cloning. Do we know whether the on-disk structures > of git are stable, i.e. can a clone of git version A be read by a git > version B with B < A? Why do we use git-minimal for cloning instead of git-minimal/pinned?
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm index f22b891ba5..16b47d0aa7 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm @@ -5128,7 +5128,7 @@ (define-public python-pbr (arguments `(#:tests? #f)) ;; Most tests seem to use the Internet. (propagated-inputs - (list git)) ;; pbr actually uses the "git" binary. + (list git-minimal/pinned)) ;; pbr actually uses the "git" binary. (native-inputs `(("python-fixtures" ,python-fixtures-bootstrap) ;; discover, coverage, hacking, subunit