diff mbox series

[bug#40677,V3,12/15] gnu: jami: Bump to 20200401.1.6f090de.

Message ID 20200502011450.2676-13-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl
State Accepted
Headers show
Series Jami patches. | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
cbaines/comparison success View comparision
cbaines/git branch success View Git branch
cbaines/applying patch success View Laminar job
cbaines/comparison success View comparision
cbaines/git branch success View Git branch
cbaines/applying patch fail View Laminar job
cbaines/comparison success View comparision
cbaines/git branch success View Git branch
cbaines/applying patch fail View Laminar job

Commit Message

Jan Wielkiewicz May 2, 2020, 1:14 a.m. UTC 
* gnu/packages/jami.scm (%jami-version): Change to 20200401.1.6f090de.
(jami-source): Adjust the control sum.
---
 gnu/packages/jami.scm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Mathieu Othacehe May 2, 2020, 9:19 a.m. UTC | #1 
> -(define %jami-version "20191101.3.67671e7")
> +(define %jami-version "20200401.1.6f090de")

Turns out this one needs to be applied before the pjproject update.

Mathieu
Mathieu Othacehe May 2, 2020, 9:25 a.m. UTC | #2 
> -(define %jami-version "20191101.3.67671e7")
> +(define %jami-version "20200401.1.6f090de")

Ok, so I merged this one with the previous one. As you noted pjproject
still fails to build in 2.10. Even if Jami variant is now ok, it would
be great if you could fix pjproject build too.

Thanks,

Mathieu
Jan Wielkiewicz May 2, 2020, 11:33 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Sat, 02 May 2020 11:19:39 +0200
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> wrote:

> > -(define %jami-version "20191101.3.67671e7")
> > +(define %jami-version "20200401.1.6f090de")  
> 
> Turns out this one needs to be applied before the pjproject update.
> 
> Mathieu

Yes, this can be the case. Patches are taken from jami-source and if the
version isn't updated it can break.


Jan Wielkiewicz
Jan Wielkiewicz May 2, 2020, 3:04 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Sat, 02 May 2020 11:25:56 +0200
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> wrote:

> > -(define %jami-version "20191101.3.67671e7")
> > +(define %jami-version "20200401.1.6f090de")  
> 
> Ok, so I merged this one with the previous one. As you noted pjproject
> still fails to build in 2.10. Even if Jami variant is now ok, it would
> be great if you could fix pjproject build too.

I can try, but haven't succeeded so far.

> Thanks,
> 
> Mathieu


Jan Wielkiewicz
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gnu/packages/jami.scm b/gnu/packages/jami.scm
index 86745e8be1..4b2a553f71 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/jami.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/jami.scm
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ 
   #:use-module (guix packages)
   #:use-module (guix utils))
 
-(define %jami-version "20191101.3.67671e7")
+(define %jami-version "20200401.1.6f090de")
 
 (define* (jami-source #:key without-daemon)
   (origin
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ 
          #f))
     (sha256
      (base32
-      "0kw172w2ccyz438kf5xqw14nhfm4xk6a2libnzib9j2wvhlpf4q0"))))
+      "0lryx9n1jn0jsw7s10pbwivqv0d5m3jdzhdhdyg5n02v72mjvkmh"))))
 
 ;; Savoir-Faire Linux modifies many libraries to add features
 ;; to Jami. This procedure makes applying patches to a given