Message ID | cover.1709038102.git.hako@ultrarare.space |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 5972327BBE9; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:53:34 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD, SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F8DD27BBE2 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:53:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1rewx0-00009v-TH; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:52:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rewwz-00009b-92 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:52:50 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rewwz-0002og-0r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:52:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rewxC-0004bJ-Mi; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#69424] [PATCH 0/5] Update Noto fonts and switch them to variable fonts (77% size reduced). Resent-From: Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: all_but_last@163.com, iyzsong@envs.net, yangjiwei@protonmail.com, guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.69424.B.170903832417491@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 69424 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 69424@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space>, Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>, =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@envs.net>, Jiwei YANG <yangjiwei@protonmail.com> X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>, =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH?= =?utf-8?b?5q2m?= <iyzsong@envs.net>, Jiwei YANG <yangjiwei@protonmail.com> Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170903832417491 (code B ref -1); Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:53:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2024 12:52:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rewwF-0004Y0-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:52:04 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <hako@ultrarare.space>) id 1rewwC-0004XX-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:52:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <hako@ultrarare.space>) id 1rewvl-0008OB-5q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:51:33 -0500 Received: from mail.boiledscript.com ([144.168.59.46]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <hako@ultrarare.space>) id 1rewvi-0002g8-3f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:51:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ultrarare.space; s=dkim; t=1709038267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lo0n4mzVVUHy579GE8QWMa6Fbxadw6ClEowkCCNcveI=; b=1vbPNj2ojkntgRLUeCDzquAj3PRfUzJWEv4UmX9LZqaNvtgNX4zH1/Ah+lX8LxALX7ntH1 aL8nmPNyL53NNvKTY+lw3sIRpTeZ16feyYctHPE1j2omwIKGL61gwrgvmuG3u8JovO1bnW hgV41RwQK04Z6REypiavncFpw4JwYV3cOsphbT45Kqi3oQYAyamKrITPn9SqBV1NDNzVWh n0HfVVqnGDZwLYBFY7Ngzsz+9mboQPHMg8vCfqlbAGq+uJ61S/bhU/FZlqdBwdOIqMd7gw XrgfcmHeZuto2s+JD19UY4kTSlyFrrrOi8x2SvfRQ0/46VfRHUi0fitygqE3Zg== Authentication-Results: mail.boiledscript.com; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=hako@ultrarare.space Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:49:58 +0800 Message-ID: <cover.1709038102.git.hako@ultrarare.space> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: + Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.168.59.46; envelope-from=hako@ultrarare.space; helo=mail.boiledscript.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-to: Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space> X-ACL-Warn: , Hilton Chain via Guix-patches <guix-patches@gnu.org> From: Hilton Chain via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Update Noto fonts and switch them to variable fonts (77% size reduced).
|
|
Message
Hilton Chain
Feb. 27, 2024, 12:49 p.m. UTC
Before: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix size font-google-noto store item total self /gnu/store/jcaffgp0yzjh3y0c6lfgdazhmrbh26nn-font-google-noto-23.11.1 564.2 564.2 100.0% total: 564.2 MiB $ guix size font-google-noto-sans-cjk store item total self /gnu/store/afgaar19vjahvxxnx2xy7807l74v62wj-font-google-noto-sans-cjk-2.004 124.6 124.6 100.0% total: 124.6 MiB $ guix size font-google-noto-serif-cjk store item total self /gnu/store/qrw5hdllxp8r006rzkplma7r5is5li7g-font-google-noto-serif-cjk-2.001 173.2 173.2 100.0% total: 173.2 MiB --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- After: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix size font-google-noto store item total self /gnu/store/fpmdqfgsrjmkp6adjgpxzsvl9x2islxw-font-google-noto-24.2.1 81.5 81.5 100.0% total: 81.5 MiB $ ./pre-inst-env guix size font-google-noto-sans-cjk store item total self /gnu/store/py51ihmwln5ys69lm37wglqw8sq6139b-font-google-noto-sans-cjk-2.004 61.6 61.6 100.0% total: 61.6 MiB $ ./pre-inst-env guix size font-google-noto-serif-cjk store item total self /gnu/store/nfhsf0dkd66s3r2lqi76qbh3bgazyf5v-font-google-noto-serif-cjk-2.002 54.2 54.2 100.0% total: 54.2 MiB --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Hilton Chain (5): gnu: font-google-noto: Update to 24.2.1. gnu: font-google-noto: Keep only variable fonts when available. gnu: font-google-noto-emoji: Update to 2.042. gnu: font-google-noto-sans-cjk: Switch to variable fonts. gnu: font-google-noto-serif-cjk: Update to 2.002. gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) base-commit: 75bad75367fcf2c289fae3b40dbcc850f92177be -- 2.41.0
Comments
Thanks! For font-google-noto-sans-cjk and font-google-noto-serif-cjk, will it be good to use "Super OTC" fonts? In my case, LibreOffice (flatpak version) was unable to recognize "Super OTC" edition but it is fixed now. There may still be some compatibility problems that I have not noticed.
Hi! On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:19:41 +0800, Jiwei YANG via Guix-patches via wrote: > > Thanks! For font-google-noto-sans-cjk and font-google-noto-serif-cjk, will it > be good to use "Super OTC" fonts? In my case, LibreOffice (flatpak version) > was unable to recognize "Super OTC" edition but it is fixed now. There may > still be some compatibility problems that I have not noticed. Since in this series I'm switching to variable fonts, the (static) "Super OTC" format has no advantage in either feature or size. Thanks
Applied the series as 17b1350f68d5...b6835ef46224, closing.