Message ID | cover.1707146219.git.dariqq@posteo.net |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 5CD0427BBEB; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:47:00 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F6427BBEA for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:46:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1rX1BQ-0004ic-Cj; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rX1BL-0004gP-WD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:52 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rX1BL-0005De-1l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rX1BW-0005mC-Lf; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#68937] [PATCH 0/3] Orca fixes Resent-From: Dariqq <dariqq@posteo.net> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: liliana.prikler@gmail.com, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com, rg@raghavgururajan.name, vivien@planete-kraus.eu, guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.68937.B.170714798822154@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 68937 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 68937@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Dariqq <dariqq@posteo.net>, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>, Raghav Gururajan <rg@raghavgururajan.name>, Vivien Kraus <vivien@planete-kraus.eu> X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>, Raghav Gururajan <rg@raghavgururajan.name>, Vivien Kraus <vivien@planete-kraus.eu> Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170714798822154 (code B ref -1); Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:47:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2024 15:46:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52097 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rX1Ax-0005lE-Ir for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:28 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:58242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <dariqq@posteo.net>) id 1rX1Aq-0005kl-Bj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dariqq@posteo.net>) id 1rX1AY-00043z-3f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:02 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <dariqq@posteo.net>) id 1rX1AN-0000WP-AE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:46:01 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814F2240107 for <guix-patches@gnu.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:45:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1707147944; bh=fqwWOptNvVs0g+iQ3dIoVupoJA4NQ8hEL68xGWE+wBA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=dBK1cGNnTZrLg0I83hbKjUXuoBXD0WmDXeJL1TJwTDpaTFjGxjgaDeMkgXAy1tajm 68SdK9SBtwYcRmawJm1JO8gcZ5Z1kFf1t+cA3nKc0zzg2gsOA6qzykbOxyYvyvKCVu eV9X9zOda3MJ86SK8ChFqK/l2ihrJmF4lOgSO4gGX8ygFePgXZUkpC1QGxTQ6zRLCa d3iqmdK3K/cRU5pmideXYiD13Sv1lZ4Y3sDRPn3Aii023SDV9u54hqej1To4xCOEeb YuoT4K9vRSnwJErSqncInGAW1UbS/ZghEPkOjEGY0wZA8qBzioPxMRJMapSXvQD+pb 16oV7ngZm1m4g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TT9h80n7Yz6tsf; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:45:44 +0100 (CET) From: Dariqq <dariqq@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:44:52 +0000 Message-ID: <cover.1707146219.git.dariqq@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=dariqq@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series | Orca fixes | |
Message
Dariqq
Feb. 5, 2024, 3:44 p.m. UTC
Hi, As reported in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64357 orca currently fails to run. The issue seems to be that the 'import pyatspi' statement fails when at-spi2-atk is in 'GI_TYPELIB_PATH' with the changes to the '__init__.py' done in the python-pyatspi guix package. I have removed the at-spi2-atk package and at least orca is not complaining. Then there was also the issue that orca was not able to find the orca modules which was solved by adding them to GUIX_PYTHONPATH. This makes orca able to run again. I also added some of the optional dependencies to orca which required fixing the brltty package first. Dariqq (3): gnu: orca: Fix invocation errors. gnu: brltty: Fix python package install. gnu: orca: Add more optional dependencies. gnu/packages/accessibility.scm | 10 +++++++- gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) base-commit: 179bb57d2532ee6b81791e078b0f782cbf88cb84
Comments
Hello! Le lundi 05 février 2024 à 15:44 +0000, Dariqq a écrit : > As reported in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64357 orca currently fails > to run. I believe this specific issue does not arise anymore with orca 44.2 on gnome-team: it does some screen reading. Does it fix your issue? Otherwise, could you rebase your work on top of gnome-team ? Best regards, Vivien
Hi Vivien, I think I messed something up when I tried to check the gnome-team version earlier today. Checked again now and orca-44.2 is working. So please ignore patch 1. I'll rebase patches 2 and 3 on gnome-team enabling liblouis and brltty in orca and send them again. On 05.02.24 17:50, Vivien Kraus wrote: > Hello! > > Le lundi 05 février 2024 à 15:44 +0000, Dariqq a écrit : >> As reported in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64357 orca currently fails >> to run. > I believe this specific issue does not arise anymore with orca 44.2 on > gnome-team: it does some screen reading. Does it fix your issue? > Otherwise, could you rebase your work on top of gnome-team ? > > Best regards, > > Vivien
user guix usertag 68937 + reviewed-looks-good thanks Guix QA review form submission: The new lint warning is Guix’ fault I think. I checked orca and it still reads the screen correctly. I’m not a regular user of orca. I’m not a maintainer, I’m not a committer. I’m a relatively new member of the GNOME team. I’ve been involved as I asked for the patches to be rebased on gnome- team. Items marked as checked: Package builds, Commit messages
Vivien Kraus via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes: > user guix > usertag 68937 + reviewed-looks-good > thanks > > Guix QA review form submission: > The new lint warning is Guix’ fault I think. > > I checked orca and it still reads the screen correctly. I’m not a > regular user of orca. > > I’m not a maintainer, I’m not a committer. I’m a relatively new member > of the GNOME team. > > I’ve been involved as I asked for the patches to be rebased on gnome- > team. > > Items marked as checked: Package builds, Commit messages Thanks both, unfortunately QA is not very useful for gnome-team at the moment since it hasn't started building it. The builds for this issue were also blocked by builtin:git-download related failures. The changes look fine to me though, so I've pushed both patches to gnome-team as 952c691b51f8f5d56df69686c2785414709c7949. Thanks, Chris
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Good signature from 5E28A33B0B84F577 Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> (trust ultimate) created at 2024-02-10T11:13:32+0000 using RSA]] > > Vivien Kraus via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> writes: > >> user guix >> usertag 68937 + reviewed-looks-good >> thanks >> >> Guix QA review form submission: >> The new lint warning is Guix’ fault I think. >> >> I checked orca and it still reads the screen correctly. I’m not a >> regular user of orca. >> >> I’m not a maintainer, I’m not a committer. I’m a relatively new member >> of the GNOME team. >> >> I’ve been involved as I asked for the patches to be rebased on gnome- >> team. >> >> Items marked as checked: Package builds, Commit messages > > Thanks both, unfortunately QA is not very useful for gnome-team at the > moment since it hasn't started building it. The builds for this issue > were also blocked by builtin:git-download related > failures. > > The changes look fine to me though, so I've pushed both patches to > gnome-team as 952c691b51f8f5d56df69686c2785414709c7949. Forgot to close.