Message ID | 87bm53n3iu.fsf@ngyro.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Make GDM usable | expand |
Hi Timothy,
thanks!
I've pushed this series to master as:
92deb5cc920fcc7617302986180f1abee5fd2b26
89c8656200a21485fd50fe4d277792d7d56c63e0
de409e82261eb147b6614aef8731d795ca664ef0
48c8d067d4ded776939cda6f9c63c25b38ba77fc
I've taken a look at gnu/system/pam.scm where unix-pam-service is defined,
and it just does "auth sufficient pam_rootok.so". This means that root
will be allowed to log in without password (which is what is documented
there, too).
But how come it (or gdm) then allows any user?
Fedora does it differently:
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Enabling_Root_User_For_GNOME_Display_Manager
> auth required pam_succeed_if.so user != root quiet
Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> writes: > Hi Timothy, > > thanks! > > I've pushed this series to master as: > > 92deb5cc920fcc7617302986180f1abee5fd2b26 > 89c8656200a21485fd50fe4d277792d7d56c63e0 > de409e82261eb147b6614aef8731d795ca664ef0 > 48c8d067d4ded776939cda6f9c63c25b38ba77fc Thank you! > I've taken a look at gnu/system/pam.scm where unix-pam-service is defined, > and it just does "auth sufficient pam_rootok.so". This means that root > will be allowed to log in without password (which is what is documented > there, too). > > But how come it (or gdm) then allows any user? More specifically, it means that root is authorized to perform whatever action PAM is being asked about without providing a password. In this case, “root” is GDM itself, and the action is “log in as so-and-so”. Hence, PAM says, “sure thing, root, log in as whoever you like!” The part I’m not certain about is why GDM is running as root. My current understanding is that it is running with effective UID gdm and real UID root. I remember reading in the docs that “pam_rootok.so” only cares about real UID [1]. > Fedora does it differently: > > See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Enabling_Root_User_For_GNOME_Display_Manager > >> auth required pam_succeed_if.so user != root quiet That looks better. That would be easy to add if people find it useful. (I wouldn’t bother with it, but if Fedora does it, then it must be popular enough.) [1] http://www.linux-pam.org/Linux-PAM-html/sag-pam_rootok.html -- Tim