Message ID | 20240928050035.28933-1-bigbookofbug@proton.me |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 0890727BBE9; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 06:33:02 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE,SPF_HELO_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8390927BBE2 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 06:33:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1suQ4I-0007rw-SQ; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:32:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1suQ4H-0007rj-5F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:32:34 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1suQ4G-0003aY-Sb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:32:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=O6slr6vgb4+v/aewxupndMxza3uoTex2+cfGpdZjggg=; b=EzViG8ub6A+cXzn0bqP5nStm2icRJ6C5967kQYgf08CLwdtpm87c+Ms9WlEEWCQKY0sKSCw26i89mfMl0jcetj2H/mC73mqcdAHZAKr3le5qtY5EtWNbQz3Lg+SUJ7/2+uB2uBu06ftENB2XHFqkH9KnQV0DRvnnJEt65ECl1bKKbYXwRSAybMf5DhdDGbVNUDJVUj/ugYQ7duvc3SOfCeCeeUPDXK2D2THDZkbaK0yODaIiUwPbN1HzgNAnqQqgNJKdzzIM7blMCG2hZllONTwaN7ICP3yTEXVusS3D5MHjpIhnRzrdQuaNZI7gq8q87VNTXK55VLFwHDX9Qdl96Q==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1suQ4k-0000Tg-9A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73523] [PATCH 0/3] gnu: add pywlroots Resent-From: bigbookofbug@proton.me Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 05:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.73523.B.17275015701795@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 73523 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 73523@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: big bug <bigbookofbug@proton.me> X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.17275015701795 (code B ref -1); Sat, 28 Sep 2024 05:33:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2024 05:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1suQ4X-0000So-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:32:49 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bigbookofbug@proton.me>) id 1suQ4U-0000SN-Oy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:32:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bigbookofbug@proton.me>) id 1suPZl-00014T-4m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:01:01 -0400 Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.133]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bigbookofbug@proton.me>) id 1suPZi-00007w-0H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 01:01:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1727499648; x=1727758848; bh=O6slr6vgb4+v/aewxupndMxza3uoTex2+cfGpdZjggg=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=XiIoSQwrALBexNSe263V5c7xBuUuifuaih902KGscfIKngUX1++JbmV3Y4lO7IHEg eIfdl77YlDx+KseNIWrxMj2/iqzO8k0TxuEahjDrooLSLqQ+8LxHjbueaKGkaVsEvv UHm8UpVl/K5+RHrXu8fQET9804jpDp67HuldXuQhrbX5BGKHN+dfX9FKmn6rakd/Uv yFvBS/muId30sXCQcPw/nGFpMUh/i7JAaN2jc7a3XE4tHJxdd+hp6BXF+XrkdaJW8f 2NwQFUPO2Id3cg3NI5IliA+pgIxFnECKFQszv4rx3G/omb01ToqU+sosFiEcWB1kNk oKlNTxovZbGqQ== Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 05:00:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20240928050035.28933-1-bigbookofbug@proton.me> Feedback-ID: 84785949:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 0b9bbfb3bf1f92b817beeb3207c45861c39fe1d4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.133; envelope-from=bigbookofbug@proton.me; helo=mail-40133.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-to: bigbookofbug@proton.me X-ACL-Warn: , bigbookofbug--- via Guix-patches <guix-patches@gnu.org> From: bigbookofbug--- via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
gnu: add pywlroots
|
|
Message
tusharhero--- via Guix-patches via
Sept. 28, 2024, 5 a.m. UTC
From: big bug <bigbookofbug@proton.me>
This is a series of patches building pywlroots and its dependencies. These can be used to eventually build a version of qtile with wayland support.
big bug (3):
gnu: add python-pywlroots
gnu: add pywlroots
gnu: add pywlroots
gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
base-commit: 5e888ec915cfdd256e726959cdc23293bc36277e
Comments
Hello big bug, Thank you for your submission; I modified the patch files as they were all garbled when pulled down and failed to apply. I'm curious as to how the original commits were created, were they by chance manually copied up instead of being sent using git:send-email? Here is a StackOverflow on how to setup git:send-email: https://stackoverflow.com/q/68238912 it is for gmail instead of proton mail, but should give a general idea (and if you can't link proton mail this way, you can always create an anonymous gmail to send in patches (someone else can chime in if there is an alternate way to send patches that is more compatible with proton mail/manual copy paste). Additionally, Guix has additional documentation on how to send in patches (and patch series): 1. https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html 2. https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Sending-a-Patch-Series.html For future reviewers, I have not extensively checked out the patches/verified that they are working; but they should now build successfully. v/r, Aaron P.S. There is also the Mumi interface for sending patches, but I have yet to try it personally: * https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Debbugs-User-Interfaces.html
"Aaron Covrig" <aaron.covrig.us@ieee.org> writes: > Hello big bug, > > Thank you for your submission; I modified the patch files as > they were > all garbled when pulled down and failed to apply. I'm curious as > to how > the original commits were created, were they by chance manually > copied > up instead of being sent using git:send-email? Here is a > StackOverflow > on how to setup > git:send-email: https://stackoverflow.com/q/68238912 it is for > gmail > instead of proton mail, but should give a general idea (and if > you > can't link proton mail this way, you can always create an > anonymous > gmail to send in patches (someone else can chime in if there is > an > alternate way to send patches that is more compatible with > proton > mail/manual copy paste). > > Additionally, Guix has additional documentation on how to send > in > patches (and patch series): > 1. https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html > 2. https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Sending-a-Patch-Series.html > > For future reviewers, I have not extensively checked out the > patches/verified that they are working; but they should now > build > successfully. > > v/r, > > Aaron > > P.S. > > There is also the Mumi interface for sending patches, but I have > yet to > try it personally: > * > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Debbugs-User-Interfaces.html hello aaron, thank you for formatting and the links! this was my first attempt using git send-email, and was encountering several issues, which may be the source of the garbling. the original commits were made using the steps laid out in https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Sending-a-Patch-Series.html, but the aforementioned issues had me having to resend the failed emails from my proton account. i've since resolved it so i future patch submissions should not be garbled. emma -- emma EF515F7D600717781DF9AB2E0FB1CF2867A117F5