From patchwork Wed Jul 22 08:34:45 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexandros Theodotou X-Patchwork-Id: 23304 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 1639127BBE3; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:37:09 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3049327BBE1 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:37:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37786 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAFP-0001lU-P3 for patchwork@mira.cbaines.net; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:37:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAFK-0001lN-Mh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:37:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAFK-0008Oa-DL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:37:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAFK-0005iZ-7O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42473] [PATCH] gnu: zrythm: Update to 0.8.694. Resent-From: Alexandros Theodotou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 42473 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 42473@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Guix patches Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.159540696721916 (code B ref -1); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:37:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2020 08:36:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41260 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAER-0005hO-9t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:36:07 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:53450) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAEN-0005hC-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:36:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAEM-0001im-U1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:36:02 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.142]:58403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyAEF-000833-QU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:36:02 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E412400FC for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:34:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4BBTKj4VF0z9rxY for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:34:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <0e6300fea9caa1f9d7645c968a7c5b50d89f7b5c.camel@zrythm.org> From: Alexandros Theodotou Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:34:45 +0100 User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.142; envelope-from=alex@zrythm.org; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/22 04:34:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches Hi, This is actually 2 patches. The first updates libcyaml and the 2nd Zrythm. Note that I (Zrythm author) have added a trademark policy to Zrythm that says modified versions that include the trademarks require permission (as discussed on IRC with a few people): https://www.zrythm.org/en/trademarks.html I am not 100% sure if patching the xdg-open path counts as a modified version, but in any case this email is signed using the same key used to sign the release, so it can be interpreted as "written permission" to redistribute this. The FSDG allows trademarks from what I understand: ``` Trademarks are associated with some software. For example, the name of a program may be trademarked, or its interface may display a trademarked logo. Often, the use of these marks will be controlled in some way; in particular, developers are commonly asked to remove references to the trademark from the software when they modify it. In extreme cases, these restrictions may effectively render the program nonfree. It is unfair for someone to ask you to remove a trademark from modified code if that trademark is scattered all throughout the original source. As long as the practical requirements are reasonable, however, free system distributions may include these programs, either with or without the trademarks. Similarly, the distribution itself may hold particular trademarks. It is not a problem if modification requires removal of these trademarks, as long as they can readily be removed without losing functionality. However, it is unacceptable to use trademarks to restrict verbatim copying and redistribution of the whole distribution, or any part. ``` And Zrythm now has a meson option for easily changing the program name, if you would prefer to rename it to something else (Z-Daw for example). Changing the logo is also very trivial, and I plan to add freely licensed replacements in future releases to make it even easier to replace. So it is up to the maintainers to decide if they want to keep Zrythm as it is or rename it. Either way, I am happy with either decision, although I would prefer if you were OK with keeping the "Zrythm" name (as long as there's no patches to remove/add functionality or links to the Zrythm website or things like that). Thanks, Alex From d95da9e9b272ac2706946b4c7ef01a99149cbe7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandros Theodotou Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 14:29:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: libcyaml: Update to 1.1.0. * gnu/packages/web.scm (libcyaml): Update to 1.1.0. --- gnu/packages/web.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/web.scm b/gnu/packages/web.scm index 47162c49de..17ed65595d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/web.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/web.scm @@ -5014,7 +5014,7 @@ written in C. It is developed as part of the NetSurf project.") (define-public libcyaml (package (name "libcyaml") - (version "1.0.1") + (version "1.1.0") (source (origin (method git-fetch) @@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ written in C. It is developed as part of the NetSurf project.") (commit (string-append "v" version)))) (file-name (git-file-name name version)) (sha256 - (base32 "0h5ydyqdl8kzh526np3jsi0pm7ks16nh1hjkdsjcd6pacw7y6i6z")))) + (base32 "0428p0rwq71nhh5nzcbapsbrjxa0x5l6h6ns32nxv7j624f0zd93")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments `(#:make-flags -- 2.27.0