From patchwork Tue Oct 17 12:27:46 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gabriel Wicki X-Patchwork-Id: 54932 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 196BC27BBE9; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:29:00 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E6027BBE2 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:28:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBi-0004Ay-00; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBf-00047m-HA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:40 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBd-0004xK-5T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjC2-00044K-2I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#66448] [PATCH] image: Add 'lba partition label. Resent-From: Gabriel Wicki Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66448 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 66448@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66448-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66448.169754570515581 (code B ref 66448); Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 66448) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2023 12:28:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBR-00043F-8e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:25 -0400 Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]:46713) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qsjBN-00042x-6n for 66448@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:28:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCA940146; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at antispam.ee.ethz.ch Received: from chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.2.15]) by localhost (antispam.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TxwLtgI0Hfti; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbox (212-51-128-25.fiber7.init7.net [212.51.128.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gabriel) by chimborazo.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:46 +0200 From: Gabriel Wicki Message-ID: References: <87o7h58ruw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6mud6am.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h6mud6am.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches Hello Mathieu Thanks for looking into it. And yes, that was exactly what happened. Plus i was tricked by my own setup (for once showing the LBA label and another time not). Oh well (: I've attached a possible patch for the documentation. Thanks again for the review and the clarification of the issue. Best regards From eacb1696cdc51350e3d5d223b94a2546c459d2ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-ID: From: Gabriel Wicki Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:16:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Clarify partition LBA compatibility. * doc/guix.texi (partition Reference): Clarify LBA compatibility. --- doc/guix.texi | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) base-commit: d389f6777359aa44ef9c71989fc1f49e6b222f1d diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 3517c95251..6b6d166290 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -45649,7 +45649,8 @@ partition Reference @item @code{file-system} (default: @code{"ext4"}) The partition file system as a string, defaulting to @code{"ext4"}. The supported values are @code{"vfat"}, @code{"fat16"}, @code{"fat32"} and -@code{"ext4"}. +@code{"ext4"}. @code{"vfat"}, @code{"fat16"} and @code{"fat32"} +partitions without the @code{'esp} flag are by default LBA compatible. @item @code{file-system-options} (default: @code{'()}) The partition file system creation options that should be passed to the