Message ID | HcPAHj0lMs-lzPfM1-l9nqLh5c09NRtoqdJPmiZgTJgmFCy-u0MaTK-Qel-z9nHcxF4gdR64FqwugE9Xd4OGj4mp-CMr8hpzv77PCvlbE1U=@evrl.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id DC87B27BBEA; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:18:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B3627BBE9 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:18:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org>) id 1nF0Xk-000375-H7 for patchwork@mira.cbaines.net; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 16:18:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nExxe-0004r5-V4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:33:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nExxe-0002KJ-Lz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:33:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nExxe-0007OJ-9z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53707] [PATCH] Fix bad substitution in Elixir recipe Resent-From: Cees de Groot <cg@evrl.com> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.53707.B.164374036028374@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 53707 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 53707@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: "guix-patches@gnu.org" <guix-patches@gnu.org> Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.164374036028374 (code B ref -1); Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:33:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2022 18:32:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1nExxH-0007Na-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:32:39 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <cg@evrl.com>) id 1nExxF-0007NS-JO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:32:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cg@evrl.com>) id 1nExx9-0004ai-Qt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:32:37 -0500 Received: from mail-40136.proton.ch ([185.70.40.136]:15392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <cg@evrl.com>) id 1nExx6-0002Gf-HM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:32:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:32:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evrl.com; s=protonmail3; t=1643740331; bh=YeOTQPV1/aQITgt8eiab+27pBQd2lp5ntfg/Dq6wqlc=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:From:To:Cc; b=gW4ZPszvD4D/Q7yR5vF4yiBrzLnS3UClPMG0GmZlqG+3ox9JwPpWPJgLl+54DZ+4x EkzaD0+0UJFXphrMhrnpXgGayRmRfLa9JL4PwLmaB/yiE2J6PxwOMSU7HeWGkJjELV DaMHge5CrYE6aj0K9lULooU8UWjJy9wyEC684bHzHLnHbRwJCgtoxZvpX45oCPTmNN mmJJm0+KoWvuy0LF14x7sZ6EqxTW/fWde14uqQ0COVNvpKvdPuZeGrMk2wZ1vEZHwO oKVrnX6IXk1Qc4ZlktgThwRjWcEMkk5gg6Jr3fZiQvvdI1v6iJTtMI1Yk7WNFTcisW yF4ixkSeDy2NQ== From: Cees de Groot <cg@evrl.com> Message-ID: <HcPAHj0lMs-lzPfM1-l9nqLh5c09NRtoqdJPmiZgTJgmFCy-u0MaTK-Qel-z9nHcxF4gdR64FqwugE9Xd4OGj4mp-CMr8hpzv77PCvlbE1U=@evrl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.136; envelope-from=cg@evrl.com; helo=mail-40136.proton.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Cees de Groot <cg@evrl.com> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
[bug#53707] Fix bad substitution in Elixir recipe
|
|
Commit Message
Cees de Groot
Feb. 1, 2022, 6:32 p.m. UTC
From d8148d5bb2d17f96c1a8034b1854f2b9f890e37a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cees de Groot <cg@evrl.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:29:33 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix /bin/sh replacement for Elixir
I have no clue where this went wrong, but substituting "sh" instead of "/bin/sh" was bound to fail. Maybe something upstream changed? In any case, this should be more correct.
---
gnu/packages/elixir.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.34.0
Comments
Hi, Cees de Groot <cg@evrl.com> writes: >>From d8148d5bb2d17f96c1a8034b1854f2b9f890e37a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Cees de Groot <cg@evrl.com> > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:29:33 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix /bin/sh replacement for Elixir > > I have no clue where this went wrong, but substituting "sh" instead of "/bin/sh" was bound to fail. Maybe something upstream changed? In any case, this should be more correct. > > --- > gnu/packages/elixir.scm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/elixir.scm b/gnu/packages/elixir.scm > index 3fb74a56a5..fae8279e5c 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/elixir.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/elixir.scm > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ (define-public elixir > (substitute* '("lib/mix/lib/mix/release.ex" > "lib/mix/lib/mix/tasks/release.init.ex") > (("#!/bin/sh") > - (string-append "#!" (search-input-file inputs "sh")))) > + (string-append "#!" (search-input-file inputs "/bin/sh")))) > (substitute* "bin/elixir" > (("^ERTS_BIN=$") > (string-append > -- > 2.34.0 This has already been fixed by Ludovic in commit d5353e24700102eb3fbf872800135b13e0268ea1. Closing. Maxim
diff --git a/gnu/packages/elixir.scm b/gnu/packages/elixir.scm index 3fb74a56a5..fae8279e5c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/elixir.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/elixir.scm @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ (define-public elixir (substitute* '("lib/mix/lib/mix/release.ex" "lib/mix/lib/mix/tasks/release.init.ex") (("#!/bin/sh") - (string-append "#!" (search-input-file inputs "sh")))) + (string-append "#!" (search-input-file inputs "/bin/sh")))) (substitute* "bin/elixir" (("^ERTS_BIN=$") (string-append