Message ID | 87zfoban7l.fsf@kitej |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [bug#73210] gnu: smalltalk: Fix tests. | expand |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 5:59 AM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote: > > Hi. > I tried your patch, but some tests are still failing for me. > More specifically, the "ANSI compliancy tests" are all failing with the > same error: > > [...] > > Does the build work for you every time? > What architecture are you using? I'm on x86-64 Guix system. I have built the package two more times without errors (though the output is non-deterministic). The only error I have seen was the I18N test failure before adding this locales patch. My system is x86-64 on a foreign distro.
Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> skribis: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 5:59 AM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote: >> >> Hi. >> I tried your patch, but some tests are still failing for me. >> More specifically, the "ANSI compliancy tests" are all failing with the >> same error: >> >> [...] >> >> Does the build work for you every time? >> What architecture are you using? I'm on x86-64 Guix system. > > I have built the package two more times without errors (though the > output is non-deterministic). The only error I have seen was the I18N > test failure before adding this locales patch. > > My system is x86-64 on a foreign distro. Given that the patch is correct (adding a missing input), I applied it as 22a34ea792ef0df15fd30d46f557b572c61d5404. The build farm built it fine for i686, but on x86-64 it got the same error as me (https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5765437/details). A strange thing is that if I keep the files of the failed build (with "guix build -K") and then run the tests by hand, they all succeed. I wonder where the difference with what you get could come from... What CPU does your machine have? And how much RAM?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 1:23 PM Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote: > > A strange thing is that if I keep the files of the failed build (with > "guix build -K") and then run the tests by hand, they all succeed. > > I wonder where the difference with what you get could come from... > What CPU does your machine have? And how much RAM? It's an AWS r7a (AMD EPYC 9R14), typically the smallest variant (2 CPU threads, 16 GiB RAM).
For now I disabled the tests on x86-64 in 607280fa8fe26b500ad76a3769da8e4f917cae16.
--- /dev/null 2024-09-13 06:57:13.374888392 +0000 +++ /tmp/guix-build-smalltalk-3.2.91.drv-0/smalltalk-3.2.91/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/46/stderr 2024-09-13 09:48:39.319595098 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +gst: Aborted +gst: Error occurred while not in byte code interpreter!! +/tmp/guix-build-smalltalk-3.2.91.drv-0/smalltalk-3.2.91/libgst/.libs/libgst.so.7(+0x728f7)[0x7ffff7f568f7] +/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39/lib/libc.so.6(+0x3e560)[0x7ffff7b87560] +/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39/lib/libc.so.6(+0x883fc)[0x7ffff7bd13fc] +/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39/lib/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x12)[0x7ffff7b874c2] +/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39/lib/libc.so.6(abort+0xc9)[0x7ffff7b714a3] +/tmp/guix-build-smalltalk-3.2.91.drv-0/smalltalk-3.2.91/libgst/.libs/libgst.so.7(+0x10c19)[0x7ffff7ef4c19] +/gnu/store/q46ljxrs7jh0r7qniqdcjvz3kny9226f-libsigsegv-2.14/lib/libsigsegv.so.2(+0x1288)[0x7ffff7edf288] +/gnu/store/zvlp3n8iwa1svxmwv4q22pv1pb1c9pjq-glibc-2.39/lib/libc.so.6(+0x3e560)[0x7ffff7b87560] +/tmp/guix-build-smalltalk-3.2.91.drv-0/smalltalk-3.2.91/libgst/.libs/libgst.so.7(+0x56e48)[0x7ffff7f3ae48] +/tmp/guix-build-smalltalk-3.2.91.drv-0/smalltalk-3.2.91/libgst/.libs/libgst.so.7(+0x72469)[0x7ffff7f56469] +/tmp/guix-build-smalltalk-3.2.91.drv-0/smalltalk-3.2.91/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/46/test-source: line 20: 22611 Aborted $TIMEOUT gst $image_path -f $abs_srcdir/AnsiRun.st ArrayANSITest