| Message ID | 87y35i4ucv.fsf@elephly.net |
|---|---|
| Headers | show
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 84DC116D31; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:07:28 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F7616CED for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:07:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org>) id 1h47Li-000237-Jd for patchwork@mira.cbaines.net; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:07:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h470m-0001Dn-Gp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:45:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h46fk-0005Qi-OH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:24:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h46fi-0005Mn-Ko for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h46fi-0004d9-CG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#34795] [bug#34845] [PATCH 00/30] Update LXQt to 0.14.1. Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34795.B34795.155249418917734@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34795 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Meiyo Peng <meiyo@riseup.net> Received: via spool by 34795-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34795.155249418917734 (code B ref 34795); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 34795) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2019 16:23:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h46er-0004by-Gd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:23:09 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21045) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1h46eo-0004bi-Tb for 34795@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:23:07 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552494166; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=SRGNdeXeuURWp+pXvf7VohPnl13C/cXVEyzo0Q/LKMGZebbpqvuPkaxh7MAhsL42EcZv44WibEIoX4VbPcjlMIgGbmcXx5e3+/mn9mZrF3ThnouUTfi5egQxfJ4uqw4aPZeX8QLlX1ACJjvF1gzQmLq4IIdVw3wjcvE5ThWoKuA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1552494166; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=225Jw6oe4FHQtQ5fTeg2NDreJXktDV4pIjQed9F5Rhc=; b=RMouR5GjeE4VLtg3TdAJ7qyk3FUf1MEcNrUAt/bKzcUmI4VzeK6iLFqtBfcBygAUGzQqtCwe+Achs0NjXsvrOAaMQBUASNQWM9UMKWxLhqvymkDH4kiA16b+ITrMKpjhma7oGfHVwudukOOj9LDUEVFRRYFKNWSxNiDbMPICWXs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from=<rekado@elephly.net> header.from=<rekado@elephly.net> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1552494166; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; l=319; bh=225Jw6oe4FHQtQ5fTeg2NDreJXktDV4pIjQed9F5Rhc=; b=KbJsnv6KGjKtCgeQxi6ul96SqKNH7gS4rH6zQ3GoKHaur1818j1ylPz+g8fSk0nL vWCx7JR6YUMQgs0VPeEeol3SVo9SieSNUQvkbPJCszcDNCRtdsiQuGi3fDO0peRgsyc 58GmeK9kDSEPPnTepfCObVs6ECCGQcagRIM/uOgA= Received: from localhost (141.80.247.68 [141.80.247.68]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1552494164071715.057141755707; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:22:44 -0700 (PDT) References: <20190313125656.2822-1-meiyo@riseup.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> In-reply-to: <20190313125656.2822-1-meiyo@riseup.net> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:22:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87y35i4ucv.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: 34845@debbugs.gnu.org, 34795@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Meiyo Peng <meiyo@riseup.net> writes: > Update LXQt to 0.14.1. Thank you! I see that we already received a change set in #34795, which aims to achieve the same goal. Unfortunately, #34795 is just one big diff. Do you see anything in that diff that might be useful for this patch series? -- Ricardo