From patchwork Tue Dec 20 23:29:35 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vagrant Cascadian X-Patchwork-Id: 45481 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 3A9F827BBEB; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:30:24 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF0727BBE9 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:30:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3j-0002zw-AN; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:30:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3g-0002yN-BQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:30:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3f-0003Ul-TB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:30:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3f-0005nV-DO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:30:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#60227] guile-ssh 0.16 update Resent-From: Vagrant Cascadian Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 60227 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 60227@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.167157899022243 (code B ref -1); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:30:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2022 23:29:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3S-0005mh-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:29:50 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3Q-0005mb-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:29:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3Q-0002tX-2F; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:29:48 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p7m3N-0003Mr-Qf; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:29:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:20]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF1441AA98; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:29:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=debian.org; s=1.vagrant.user; t=1671578980; bh=3U8Odx+WoB6ZhdLCaZZE+V6zjOL/mR3wdB5ubMSqPCQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=gX9A1TTFRmTBxbI5jXrjB4CCwvlgdsNDE4GIbrCTRBLQOvMzQPpwbkQJxj7E4gBZ7 kOJVo7m5oinNf2E4DDD7PB5Mx7VdxvjiU2Hwd17m1mHdQYxNJKVt3OU87woYG9mAWm NKQB7iaIb+KxjN1b3U88ZXQHKNFwIrhEmnEh7JnrmKbWabVitKmLS6OxjDVQbju2La LLLRliuL9WNK2C9RMYkLF5YxnBHr9rbAiyPsQXqRx8+yUSBkk24XBzdEaHqLyd1AYw wayqIrTjLJMdETGEnWS8rlylW5iFtQryI9KngtdFw5YDb7Vw+hQoa4b0JOa4QxvEB9 TKeiHBS+XEvPA== From: Vagrant Cascadian In-Reply-To: <87mt7iwi16.fsf@contorta> References: <87wn8jd680.fsf@contorta> <87tu3nd3im.fsf@contorta> <87cza5vc9h.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt7iwi16.fsf@contorta> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:29:35 -0800 Message-ID: <87tu1py7q8.fsf@contorta> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: none client-ip=173.255.214.101; envelope-from=vagrant@debian.org; helo=cascadia.aikidev.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches On 2022-12-20, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-11-02, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Vagrant Cascadian skribis: >>> On 2022-10-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>>> Updating guile-ssh to 0.16.0 actually went mostly smoothly, except >>>> guix-jupytertest suites fail. > ... >>> For clarity, I used: >>> >>> ./pre-inst-env guix build --keep-going $(./pre-inst-env guix refresh --list-dependent libssh guile-ssh | cut -d : -f 2 | sed -e 's,guix-daemon,guix,g' | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -v kodi | grep -v jupyter) >> >> You can also test Guix SSH functionality, to be on the safe side, for >> example by running ‘guix copy’ on the ‘guix’ package built with these >> new versions. ... > So, I attempted that in the newish wip-guile-ssh-0.16 branch, but > getting test suite failures even without the guile-ssh patches, so hard > to test that guix copy works... That seems to have been fixed by: 680970490c556ae0029aa1ba2b0faba162118186 tests: Adjust 'guix package' test to latest package search metrics. Thanks! > Is this at least the right approach? e.g. point guix at a commit where > guile-ssh is updated? Is there anything special with the revision? As > you can see from the wip-guile-ssh-0.16 branch, I tried revision "0.1" > and then switched back to "0" ... (fearing clobbering a real-world "1" > revision someday...). I pushed a wip branch just to be able to easily > pull to a commit not on master... as I don't know how to do that > locally. > > Presuming I can get guix to build successfully, do i then need to > reconfigure the systems to use a guix-daemon with guile-ssh on both? > ... and then run "guix copy" between the two systems? Well, that is what I did, pulled guix to the curren wip-guile-ssh-0.16 branch (which contains an update to guile-ssh 0.16 and updates guix to use a commit containing that), and managed to guix copy from one machine to another, so I *think* we are good! Patch attached for the guile-ssh update. Once that lands in master we can consider updating guix to use it... live well, vagrant From 6f33de5f2df02c0ca2ef05409b1993b9fc69f4f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vagrant Cascadian Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:13:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-ssh: Update to 0.16.0. * gnu/packages/ssh.scm (guile-ssh): Update to 0.16.0. --- gnu/packages/ssh.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ssh.scm b/gnu/packages/ssh.scm index babed807f9..65280bc4da 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ssh.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ssh.scm @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ (define-public openssh-sans-x (define-public guile-ssh (package (name "guile-ssh") - (version "0.15.1") + (version "0.16.0") (home-page "https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-ssh") (source (origin (method git-fetch) @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ (define-public guile-ssh (file-name (git-file-name name version)) (sha256 (base32 - "0zzn5hsf97b35gixyg4z14sspl15qwnp52y4h89wra4y31l7467q")))) + "1ka5ayrg7kysx3bi5d8s0z6n12sdc06qp9gc4k9h2mlw3vz187ny")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (outputs '("out" "debug")) (arguments -- 2.35.1