Message ID | 87ftch42bx.fsf@rohleder.de |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [bug#41048] doc: add comment about ofl for Pam mount. | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
cbaines/comparison | success | View comparision |
cbaines/git branch | success | View Git branch |
cbaines/applying patch | fail | View Laminar job |
Hi, This patch fell through the cracks… Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> skribis: > Pam mount uses `ofl` from hxtools [1] to kill processes that have open > files on the filesystem mounted. > As we dont have hxtools (and I think we shouldnt), one has to configure > pam mount to use something else, eg `fuser`. This is an attempt to > document that somehow. > > From 7a3cd9cd00cbd95e599a8d79400591e2fc589f33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> > Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 14:17:37 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] doc: add comment about ofl for Pam mount. > > * doc/guix.texi: (Pam Mount) add comment about ofl. > --- > doc/guix.texi | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi > index d5d8662937..aa182df183 100644 > --- a/doc/guix.texi > +++ b/doc/guix.texi > @@ -25441,6 +25441,8 @@ the partition where he stores his data: > (hup "0") > (term "no") > (kill "no"))) > + ;; if anything above is "true": > + ;; (ofl "/run/current-system/profile/bin/fuser -km %(MNTPT)") It’s not clear what these two lines mean. The idea is to tell users to configure PAM Mount to use ‘fuser’ as a replacement for ‘ofl’, right? I think that’d deserve one or two sentences of explanation. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo’.
Hi Ludo! Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: >> + ;; if anything above is "true": >> + ;; (ofl "/run/current-system/profile/bin/fuser -km %(MNTPT)") > > It’s not clear what these two lines mean. The idea is to tell users to > configure PAM Mount to use ‘fuser’ as a replacement for ‘ofl’, right? I > think that’d deserve one or two sentences of explanation. WDYT? Yes, that is/was the idea, because killing processes would not work otherwise. Now that we have autofs, I don't think it's relevant any more, so we can close it?
Hi Michael, Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: >>> + ;; if anything above is "true": >>> + ;; (ofl "/run/current-system/profile/bin/fuser -km %(MNTPT)") >> >> It’s not clear what these two lines mean. The idea is to tell users to >> configure PAM Mount to use ‘fuser’ as a replacement for ‘ofl’, right? I >> think that’d deserve one or two sentences of explanation. WDYT? > > Yes, that is/was the idea, because killing processes would not work > otherwise. OK. > Now that we have autofs, I don't think it's relevant any more, so we can > close it? Fine with me, done! Thanks, Ludo’.
From 7a3cd9cd00cbd95e599a8d79400591e2fc589f33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 14:17:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: add comment about ofl for Pam mount. * doc/guix.texi: (Pam Mount) add comment about ofl. --- doc/guix.texi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index d5d8662937..aa182df183 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -25441,6 +25441,8 @@ the partition where he stores his data: (hup "0") (term "no") (kill "no"))) + ;; if anything above is "true": + ;; (ofl "/run/current-system/profile/bin/fuser -km %(MNTPT)") (mkmountpoint (@@ (enable "1") (remove "true"))))) -- 2.26.2