From patchwork Fri May 28 11:06:11 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= X-Patchwork-Id: 29636 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 77F9327BC81; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:07:13 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F344D27BC78 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:07:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaKe-0002IA-5z for patchwork@mira.cbaines.net; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:07:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaKU-0002FC-0r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:07:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaKT-000801-PX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:07:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaKT-0004vS-Je for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#48637] [PATCH] website: Add publications page Resent-From: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 11:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48637 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Luis Felipe Cc: 48637@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 48637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48637.162219998318874 (code B ref 48637); Fri, 28 May 2021 11:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 48637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2021 11:06:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaJr-0004uM-HZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:06:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaJn-0004u0-AK for 48637@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:06:22 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaJi-0007JM-5R; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:06:14 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=38144 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmaJh-0005bI-TW; Fri, 28 May 2021 07:06:14 -0400 From: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <4BtcqLwBY7LgeYhUd41lhUUAcT5n2Zn9OTJUzGswTuBpLla8nBHyrQ3kJzwEMI9E7MPEnr6wBqSeCMqByldZ6i5jPR8B7ZtEi0XhwextyQo=@protonmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:06:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4BtcqLwBY7LgeYhUd41lhUUAcT5n2Zn9OTJUzGswTuBpLla8nBHyrQ3kJzwEMI9E7MPEnr6wBqSeCMqByldZ6i5jPR8B7ZtEi0XhwextyQo=@protonmail.com> (Luis Felipe's message of "Mon, 24 May 2021 23:35:24 +0000") Message-ID: <87bl8vi0d8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches Hi Luis, Nice work! It’s now on-line: https://guix.gnu.org/en/publications/ I see that you want to keep it open to non-academic publications, which is a good idea. I wonder if there should be a visual distinction between peer-reviewed scientific articles, journal articles, and other types of publications? I started adding historical LWN articles (patch below; the titles look funny in hindsight :-)), and wondered whether this was a good idea since they would come first in the list. Thoughts? We should call for contributions because I’m sure there are quite a few articles that would be worth adding. Thanks, Ludo’. diff --git a/website/apps/media/data.scm b/website/apps/media/data.scm index 8dbb035..fde5918 100644 --- a/website/apps/media/data.scm +++ b/website/apps/media/data.scm @@ -106,11 +106,26 @@ distribution.")) #:url "https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4584" #:authors "Ludovic Courtès" #:date (string->date "2013-05-20" "~Y-~m-~d")) + (publication + #:title "GNU Guix sports functional package management" + #:authors "Nathan Willis" + #:url "https://lwn.net/Articles/560857/" + #:date (string->date "2013-07-31" "~Y-~m-~d")) (publication #:title "Reproducible and User-Controlled Software Environments in HPC with Guix" #:url "https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01161771/en" #:authors (G_ "Ludovic Courtès, Ricardo Wurmus") #:date (string->date "2015-07-25" "~Y-~m-~d")) + (publication + #:title "Reproducible builds and standalone GNU systems with Guix 0.9" + #:url "https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/" + #:authors "Nathan Willis" + #:date (string->date "2015-11-18" "~Y-~m-~d")) + (publication + #:title "Security and reproducible-build progress in Guix 0.11" + #:url "https://lwn.net/Articles/696890/" + #:authors "Nathan Willis" + #:date (string->date "2016-08-10" "~Y-~m-~d")) (publication #:title "Code Staging in GNU Guix" #:url "https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00833"