| Message ID | 78e5efe95c8509b57c74309a0e3917b0cced7ca9.1683878940.git.dev@jpoiret.xyz |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bug#63461] gnu: gnome: Remove gnome-boxes from default GNOME apps. | expand |
Am Freitag, dem 12.05.2023 um 10:09 +0200 schrieb Josselin Poiret: > From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome): Remove gnome-boxes from propagated- > inputs, > since it is no longer a Core App in 42. > --- > Hi everyone, > > I noticed while reading [1] that Boxes was no longer required in > GNOME, so here's a patch that does exactly that. > > [1] > https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2023/05/10/gnome-core-apps-update/ > > Best, > > gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm > index 754bb668ba..85437c2e4a 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm > @@ -10030,7 +10030,6 @@ (define-public gnome > epiphany > evince > file-roller > - gnome-boxes > gnome-calculator > gnome-calendar > gnome-characters > > base-commit: 60cf9866cfd01bd0492bdc427a016e26d779bb4e SGTM, but we should probably offer a gnome-developer-tools meta package too if we aim to make that distinction. Also note that gnome technically isn't gnome-core: for instance, it excludes eog on platforms where it doesn't build and I personally don't aim on touching Loupe with a ten-foot pole while the Rust build system is still a blazing dumpster. Cheers
Hi Lily, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes: > SGTM, but we should probably offer a gnome-developer-tools meta package > too if we aim to make that distinction. Also note that gnome > technically isn't gnome-core: for instance, it excludes eog on > platforms where it doesn't build and I personally don't aim on touching > Loupe with a ten-foot pole while the Rust build system is still a > blazing dumpster. There are so few GNOME developer packages for now that I don't think it's necessary yet. They're also very varied so most "developers" might only need one or two. This patch was basically a reaction to the last core-updates cycle, when we were wondering why GNOME Boxes was included by default. Best,
Hi, Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> skribis: > From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome): Remove gnome-boxes from propagated-inputs, > since it is no longer a Core App in 42. I’m all for it! I also noticed that notably during the ‘core-updates’ cycle, and I think it’s just too much, as GNOME developers acknowledged by removing it from the “core apps”. Ludo’.
Hi everyone, Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> writes: > From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome): Remove gnome-boxes from propagated-inputs, > since it is no longer a Core App in 42. > --- > Hi everyone, > > I noticed while reading [1] that Boxes was no longer required in GNOME, so > here's a patch that does exactly that. > > [1] https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2023/05/10/gnome-core-apps-update/ > > Best, > > gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) Pushed as 4722496292ea282db7d1779bfada1e6a3813be99, along with the removal of the corresponding uses of it in the gnome services. Best,
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm index 754bb668ba..85437c2e4a 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm @@ -10030,7 +10030,6 @@ (define-public gnome epiphany evince file-roller - gnome-boxes gnome-calculator gnome-calendar gnome-characters
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome): Remove gnome-boxes from propagated-inputs, since it is no longer a Core App in 42. --- Hi everyone, I noticed while reading [1] that Boxes was no longer required in GNOME, so here's a patch that does exactly that. [1] https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2023/05/10/gnome-core-apps-update/ Best, gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) base-commit: 60cf9866cfd01bd0492bdc427a016e26d779bb4e