Message ID | 3d313b00d368ccc796d202957b758001de27202a.1710259199.git.Rostislav.Svoboda@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [bug#69750] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example. | expand |
Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda@gmail.com> writes: > * doc/guix.texi (Invoking @command{guix package}): Correct the module where > 'guile-final' is defined. It is actually located in (gnu packages > commencement) rather than in the (gnu packages base). > > Change-Id: I7747106916d53dcbe296b7302983c5013eb2926d > --- > doc/guix.texi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Thanks! I've pushed this to master as 4fe9aae225fa4ee0416d7cfa984bda8fcded8436. Chris
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 858d5751bf..4ab9a7663c 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ Invoking guix package @var{exp} must be a Scheme expression that evaluates to a @code{<package>} object. This option is notably useful to disambiguate between same-named variants of a package, with expressions such as -@code{(@@ (gnu packages base) guile-final)}. +@code{(@@ (gnu packages commencement) guile-final)}. Note that this option installs the first output of the specified package, which may be insufficient when needing a specific output of a