| Message ID | 3493fd05a83c57fa4782e30e7247abab92ef102f.1705527021.git.vivien@planete-kraus.eu |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bug#68551,gnome-team] gnu: gnome-desktop: Propagate gnome-remote-desktop and gnome-connections. | expand |
Am Dienstag, dem 16.01.2024 um 22:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus: > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome) [propagated-inputs]: Add gnome- > connections > and gnome-remote-desktop. Are these core GNOME applications? I think we might want to have another meta-package for these + builder + whatever-else. Cheers
Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes: > Am Dienstag, dem 16.01.2024 um 22:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus: >> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome) [propagated-inputs]: Add gnome- >> connections >> and gnome-remote-desktop. > Are these core GNOME applications? I think we might want to have > another meta-package for these + builder + whatever-else. For any query about what's core and at what version, you'll want to check in the GNOME releng repository [0]; there's no tag but the commit history is clear about the corresponding GNOME release. The release team also snapshot such file in e.g. [1]. Answering the question, yes they are part of core GNOME applications. [0] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/releng/-/blob/dcec695c6ae86a156656935d3e0247cb233e44bd/tools/versions-stable [1] https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/45.0/versions
Am Samstag, dem 20.01.2024 um 13:29 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > Hi Liliana, > > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes: > > > Am Dienstag, dem 16.01.2024 um 22:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus: > > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome) [propagated-inputs]: Add gnome- > > > connections and gnome-remote-desktop. > > Are these core GNOME applications? I think we might want to have > > another meta-package for these + builder + whatever-else. > > For any query about what's core and at what version, you'll want to > check in the GNOME releng repository [0]; there's no tag but the > commit history is clear about the corresponding GNOME release. The > release team also snapshot such file in e.g. [1]. > > Answering the question, yes they are part of core GNOME applications. > > [0] > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/releng/-/blob/dcec695c6ae86a156656935d3e0247cb233e44bd/tools/versions-stable > [1] https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/45.0/versions I'm not sure, releng is that authoritative. [2] markets devhelp as "developer extra", and only lists gnome-connections out of the two. The actual source of truth appears to be encoded in yaml files over at [3] and is appropriately version-tagged. Cheers [2] https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Websites/apps.gnome.org [3] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta
Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes: > Am Samstag, dem 20.01.2024 um 13:29 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> Hi Liliana, >> >> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Am Dienstag, dem 16.01.2024 um 22:32 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus: >> > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome) [propagated-inputs]: Add gnome- >> > > connections and gnome-remote-desktop. >> > Are these core GNOME applications? I think we might want to have >> > another meta-package for these + builder + whatever-else. >> >> For any query about what's core and at what version, you'll want to >> check in the GNOME releng repository [0]; there's no tag but the >> commit history is clear about the corresponding GNOME release. The >> release team also snapshot such file in e.g. [1]. >> >> Answering the question, yes they are part of core GNOME applications. >> >> [0] >> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/releng/-/blob/dcec695c6ae86a156656935d3e0247cb233e44bd/tools/versions-stable >> [1] https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/45.0/versions > I'm not sure, releng is that authoritative. [2] markets devhelp as > "developer extra", and only lists gnome-connections out of the two. > The actual source of truth appears to be encoded in yaml files over at > [3] and is appropriately version-tagged. I'm not sure either, but that's what I was pointed at by GNOME devs such as ebassi last time I ask in #gnome. I think it's there for a good reason, perhaps as the bill of materials used by their own GNOME image (distribution).
Hello! Le samedi 20 janvier 2024 à 20:46 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit : > [2] markets devhelp as > "developer extra", and only lists gnome-connections out of the two. It would be sad to have only gnome-connections and not gnome-remote- desktop. What remote desktop would you access? > The actual source of truth appears to be encoded in yaml files over > at > [3] and is appropriately version-tagged. Can you decipher it? I don’t understand where you would find the information. Best regards, Vivien
I’m closing this one in favor of https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68716
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm index d17676f53b..04a87626d9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm @@ -10183,6 +10183,7 @@ (define-public gnome gnome-calendar gnome-characters gnome-clocks + gnome-connections gnome-console gnome-contacts gnome-disk-utility @@ -10190,6 +10191,7 @@ (define-public gnome gnome-maps gnome-music gnome-photos + gnome-remote-desktop gnome-screenshot gnome-system-monitor gnome-text-editor