[bug#67880] teams: Add ‘core-packages’ team.
Commit Message
* etc/teams.scm (bootstrap): Add “gnu/packages/commencement.scm”.
(core-packages): New team.
(Ludovic Courtès): Add to ‘core-packages’ team.
Change-Id: I25f22d436a4dc9bf4c8f577f94cc178cbaa80768
---
etc/teams.scm | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hello Guix!
This is something we discussed last week on IRC: adding a team for
“core” packages. By that I mean: the GNU tool chain, Guile, all
the things in (gnu packages base), and probably the closure of all
this.
These are the packages we would update on ‘core-updates’, and ideally
we wouldn’t touch any other package on that branch. (So Python would
be handled on the ‘python-team’ branch, for instance.)
How does that sound?
I know of a handful of people who’d deserve to be members. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
base-commit: b681e339fa37f2a26763458ee56b31af1d6a7ec5
Comments
Hey Ludo,
> +(define-team core-packages
> + (team 'core-packages
> + #:name "Core packages"
> + #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
> + #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
> + "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
> + "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
> + "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
> + "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
> + "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
> + "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
> + "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
> + "guix/build/utils.scm"
> + "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))
Seems nice. This has probably already been discussed, but should
core-updates be renamed core-packages here to be more inline with the
teams workflow?
Thanks,
Mathieu
Hi!
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> skribis:
>> +(define-team core-packages
>> + (team 'core-packages
>> + #:name "Core packages"
>> + #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
>> + #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
>> + "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
>> + "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
>> + "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
>> + "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
>> + "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
>> + "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
>> + "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
>> + "guix/build/utils.scm"
>> + "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))
>
> Seems nice.
Cool, I’m applying the patch.
> This has probably already been discussed, but should core-updates be
> renamed core-packages here to be more inline with the teams workflow?
IMO yes, that’s the logical next step. (Maybe we can wait until the
next cycle though, dunno.)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
@@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ (define-team go
(define-team bootstrap
(team 'bootstrap
#:name "Bootstrap"
- #:scope (list "gnu/packages/mes.scm")))
+ #:scope (list "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/mes.scm")))
(define-team embedded
(team 'embedded
@@ -424,6 +425,21 @@ (define-team core
(make-regexp* "^guix/scripts/")
(make-regexp* "^guix/store/"))))
+(define-team core-packages
+ (team 'core-packages
+ #:name "Core packages"
+ #:description "Core packages: the GNU tool chain, Guile, Coreutils, etc."
+ #:scope (list "gnu/packages/base.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/commencement.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/cross-base.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/gcc.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/guile.scm"
+ "gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm"
+ "guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm"
+ "guix/build/utils.scm"
+ "guix/build-system/gnu.scm")))
+
(define-team games
(team 'games
#:name "Games and Toys"
@@ -554,7 +570,7 @@ (define-member (person "Jonathan Brielmaier"
(define-member (person "Ludovic Courtès"
"ludo@gnu.org")
- core home bootstrap installer mentors)
+ core home bootstrap core-packages installer mentors)
(define-member (person "Andreas Enge"
"andreas@enge.fr")