Message ID | 20240201150927.11453-1-w@wmeyer.eu |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-libre kernel updates (2024-02-01) | expand |
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Wilko Meyer wrote: > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-6.7-version): Update to 6.7.3. > (linux-libre-6.7-pristine-source): Update hash. Thanks! Pushed as a4464bd0975c811f18af98f69032b29bddda5b81 I noticed that the documentation package for 6.6.15 failed to build with some Sphinx error: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3393605/details ------ starting phase `build' PARSE include/uapi/linux/dvb/ca.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/dvb/dmx.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/dvb/frontend.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/dvb/net.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/media.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/cec.h PARSE include/uapi/linux/lirc.h Using alabaster theme Sphinx parallel build error: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'fname' referenced before assignment make[2]: *** [Documentation/Makefile:113: texinfodocs] Error 2 make[1]: *** [/tmp/guix-build-linux-libre-documentation-6.6.15.drv-0/linux-6.6.15/Makefile:1697: infodocs] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2 error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception: %exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("infodocs" "-j" "24") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> phase `build' failed after 2.3 seconds command "make" "infodocs" "-j" "24" failed with status 2 builder for `/gnu/store/1zh0xlpwdi05hanh9jdkxiyla1073lah-linux-libre-documentation-6.6.15.drv' failed with exit code 1 @ build-failed /gnu/store/1zh0xlpwdi05hanh9jdkxiyla1073lah-linux-libre-documentation-6.6.15.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/1zh0xlpwdi05hanh9jdkxiyla1073lah-linux-libre-documentation-6.6.15.drv' failed with exit code 1 ------ Hopefully it goes away in the next release.
Hi Leo, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes: > Thanks! Pushed as a4464bd0975c811f18af98f69032b29bddda5b81 Thanks for pushing/reviewing! > I noticed that the documentation package for 6.6.15 failed to build with > > Hopefully it goes away in the next release. We'll luckily be able to check this later on, there has been a new series of 6.x updates yesterday (e.g. 6.6.16, 6.7.4 and 6.1.77) I'll submit the patches within the next hours. If the docs error remains I'd likely try to spend time in figuring out wether that's an upstream bug and if it already has been reported.
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm index e748b2cb8e..6ca3652664 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ (define (%upstream-linux-source version hash) ;; The current "mainline" kernel. -(define-public linux-libre-6.7-version "6.7.2") +(define-public linux-libre-6.7-version "6.7.3") (define-public linux-libre-6.7-gnu-revision "gnu") (define deblob-scripts-6.7 (linux-libre-deblob-scripts @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ (define deblob-scripts-6.7 (base32 "1vb2pd0wdfl9p5qi8hj1i5xg1p4pyrp01iqhap9xbb2yai4l80j5"))) (define-public linux-libre-6.7-pristine-source (let ((version linux-libre-6.7-version) - (hash (base32 "0wd6pxh7wy9bzjzwd0rdsdnghpr53qbs722fhg07bi19m8dy8kf3"))) + (hash (base32 "0i1bfkawyp917d9v3qa5nqzspzr3ixx7scbfl8x4lms74xjqrw5p"))) (make-linux-libre-source version (%upstream-linux-source version hash) deblob-scripts-6.7)))