[bug#65233,1/2] gnu: librecast: Update to 0.7.0.

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>

* gnu/packages/networking.scm (librecast): Update to 0.7.0.
[arguments]: Drop 'remove-network-tests phase.
---
 gnu/packages/networking.scm | 25 +++----------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)


base-commit: db02fcde386892b3a054d64403a4a5bfa1b7fce8

retitle 65233 lcsync and librecast updates
thanks

Both lcsync 0.2.1 and librecast 0.7.0 have upstream releases now, thus
removing "WIP" from the title; these are worthy of merging, I hope. :)

live well,
  vagrant

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:

> Both lcsync 0.2.1 and librecast 0.7.0 have upstream releases now, thus
> removing "WIP" from the title; these are worthy of merging, I hope. :)

This looks good to me, I've pushed it to master as
5f672aaa0ca7e2c5775c8950fa1627ac419e557e.

Thanks,

Chris

On 2023-08-29, Christopher Baines wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Both lcsync 0.2.1 and librecast 0.7.0 have upstream releases now, thus
>> removing "WIP" from the title; these are worthy of merging, I hope. :)
>
> This looks good to me, I've pushed it to master as
> 5f672aaa0ca7e2c5775c8950fa1627ac419e557e.

Thanks!

It looks like you ended up merging the old librecast 0.7-RC3 patch,
rather than the 0.7.0 patch I submitted later. I apparently forgot to
mark it as a v2 patch, which maybe tripped you up.

Would it be ok if I pushed the newer version or would you be able to?

live well,
  vagrant

On 2023-08-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-08-29, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> Both lcsync 0.2.1 and librecast 0.7.0 have upstream releases now, thus
>>> removing "WIP" from the title; these are worthy of merging, I hope. :)
>>
>> This looks good to me, I've pushed it to master as
>> 5f672aaa0ca7e2c5775c8950fa1627ac419e557e.
>
> Thanks!
>
> It looks like you ended up merging the old librecast 0.7-RC3 patch,
> rather than the 0.7.0 patch I submitted later. I apparently forgot to
> mark it as a v2 patch, which maybe tripped you up.
>
> Would it be ok if I pushed the newer version or would you be able to?

I just went ahead and pushed c61c499c59109f6094384ee205c98034d759b600 as
a follow-up to update librecast to 0.7.0.

live well,
  vagrant

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Signature made by expired key DC518FC87F9716AA Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@aikidev.net>]]
> On 2023-08-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2023-08-29, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Both lcsync 0.2.1 and librecast 0.7.0 have upstream releases now, thus
>>>> removing "WIP" from the title; these are worthy of merging, I hope. :)
>>>
>>> This looks good to me, I've pushed it to master as
>>> 5f672aaa0ca7e2c5775c8950fa1627ac419e557e.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> It looks like you ended up merging the old librecast 0.7-RC3 patch,
>> rather than the 0.7.0 patch I submitted later. I apparently forgot to
>> mark it as a v2 patch, which maybe tripped you up.
>>
>> Would it be ok if I pushed the newer version or would you be able to?
>
> I just went ahead and pushed c61c499c59109f6094384ee205c98034d759b600 as
> a follow-up to update librecast to 0.7.0.

Apologies for this, I didn't check that I'd got the right patches before
pushing. The slightly longer story is that I cherry picked these from
the guix-patches repository [1], but a bug in QA meant that it hadn't
been updating the branches, so I cherry picked the earlier version of
the patch.

1: https://git.guix-patches.cbaines.net/guix-patches/

On 2023-08-31, Christopher Baines wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Signature made by expired key DC518FC87F9716AA Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@aikidev.net>]]
>> On 2023-08-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> On 2023-08-29, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Both lcsync 0.2.1 and librecast 0.7.0 have upstream releases now, thus
>>>>> removing "WIP" from the title; these are worthy of merging, I hope. :)
>>>>
>>>> This looks good to me, I've pushed it to master as
>>>> 5f672aaa0ca7e2c5775c8950fa1627ac419e557e.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> It looks like you ended up merging the old librecast 0.7-RC3 patch,
>>> rather than the 0.7.0 patch I submitted later. I apparently forgot to
>>> mark it as a v2 patch, which maybe tripped you up.
>>>
>>> Would it be ok if I pushed the newer version or would you be able to?
>>
>> I just went ahead and pushed c61c499c59109f6094384ee205c98034d759b600 as
>> a follow-up to update librecast to 0.7.0.
>
> Apologies for this, I didn't check that I'd got the right patches before
> pushing.

No worries, it was easy enough to fix. :)

> The slightly longer story is that I cherry picked these from
> the guix-patches repository [1], but a bug in QA meant that it hadn't
> been updating the branches, so I cherry picked the earlier version of
> the patch.
>
> 1: https://git.guix-patches.cbaines.net/guix-patches/

This is so tremendously useful, even with a few glitches now and then! I
only recently learned about it!

live well,
  vagrant