Message ID | 20220117225516.21249-1-jgart@dismail.de |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [bug#53330] guix: gexp: Export gexp-inputs. | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
cbaines/comparison | success | View comparision |
cbaines/git branch | success | View Git branch |
cbaines/applying patch | success | View Laminar job |
cbaines/issue | success | View issue |
Hi Guixers, wdyt? gexp-inputs can be a useful function that can be part of the public interface. Why might this be a good/bad idea? I can send a patch for gexp-outputs if it makes sense to do so also. all best, jgart
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:19:08 -0500 jgart <jgart@dismail.de> wrote: > Hi Guixers, wdyt? > > gexp-inputs can be a useful function that can be part of the > public interface. Why might this be a good/bad idea? > > I can send a patch for gexp-outputs if it makes sense to do so also. > > all best, > > jgart close 53330 civodul: jgart: i'd rather not expose gexp internals 01/17/2022 | 06:21:27 PM civodul: there's lower-gexp if you really need something low-level
Doxxed! Thanks! jgart
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm index 01dca902f7..bdcac652a8 100644 --- a/guix/gexp.scm +++ b/guix/gexp.scm @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ (define-module (guix gexp) gexp-input gexp-input? + gexp-inputs gexp-input-thing gexp-input-output gexp-input-native?