Message ID | 20210509072852.1699567-1-philip@philipmcgrath.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [bug#48308] gnu: racket: Update to 8.1. | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
cbaines/comparison | success | View comparision |
cbaines/git branch | success | View Git branch |
cbaines/applying patch | success | View Laminar job |
cbaines/issue | success | View issue |
On Sun, 9 May 2021, Philip McGrath wrote: > * gnu/packages/racket.scm (racket-minimal): Update to 8.1. > [arguments](#:phases): Remove 'patch-chez-configure: fixes applied upstream. > (racket): Update to 8.1. Thanks for making the update. I tested building both racket and racket-minimal on x86_64, and was able to do a lite REPL session in each one without problems. Its nice that you CS building patch made it into upstream. Congratulations. Not related to the update, but I noticed `guix lint` complain about the racket synopsis (it begins with an article). I think we could just drop the 'a' and leave the rest of it as is and it would still make sense and satisfy the linter. Best, Jack
On 5/9/21 4:34 PM, Jack Hill wrote: > Not related to the update, but I noticed `guix lint` complain about the > racket synopsis (it begins with an article). I think we could just drop > the 'a' and leave the rest of it as is and it would still make sense and > satisfy the linter. Ah, yes, I had noticed that. It's not a big deal and I'm happy to defer to community consensus. I had kept the "a" because it's a reference to Felleisen et. al.'s "A Programmable Programming Language" (Communications of the ACM, March 2018) [1], the title of which in turn is a quote Foderaro's "LISP: Introduction" (Communications of the ACM, September 1991) [2]: > When Lisp adopts a new paradigm, it not only replicates > existing practice, but goes beyond it to become a testbed > for advancing the state of the art. Why has Lisp been able > to adapt so easily when other languages have not? One > reason is that Lisp is a *programmable* programming language. > Not only can you program *in* Lisp (that makes it a programming > language) but you can program the language itself. [1]: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/3/225475-a-programmable-programming-language/fulltext [2]: https://doi.org/10.1145/114669.114670 -Philip
On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 04:34:02PM -0400, Jack Hill wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2021, Philip McGrath wrote: > > > * gnu/packages/racket.scm (racket-minimal): Update to 8.1. > > [arguments](#:phases): Remove 'patch-chez-configure: fixes applied upstream. > > (racket): Update to 8.1. > > Thanks for making the update. I tested building both racket and > racket-minimal on x86_64, and was able to do a lite REPL session in each one > without problems. > > Its nice that you CS building patch made it into upstream. Congratulations. > > Not related to the update, but I noticed `guix lint` complain about the > racket synopsis (it begins with an article). I think we could just drop the > 'a' and leave the rest of it as is and it would still make sense and satisfy > the linter. > Thank you both, I'm taking this as confirmation that the package works. Patch pushed!
diff --git a/gnu/packages/racket.scm b/gnu/packages/racket.scm index f2bbf28564..18af14b2ec 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/racket.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/racket.scm @@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ (define-public racket-minimal (package (name "racket-minimal") - (version "8.0") ; note: remember to also update racket! + (version "8.1") ; note: remember to also update racket! (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (map (lambda (base) (string-append base version "/racket-minimal-src.tgz")) %installer-mirrors)) - (sha256 "0mwyffw4gcci8wmzxa3j28h03h0gsz55aard8qrk3lri8r2xyg21") + (sha256 "04zzqybpxss50n1jrwwq98539gw0y0ygpw9civl2sq3s4ww7m8l3") (patches (search-patches "racket-sh-via-rktio.patch")))) (home-page "https://racket-lang.org") @@ -100,36 +100,6 @@ (srfi srfi-1)) #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases - (add-after 'unpack 'patch-chez-configure - (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) - (substitute* "src/cs/c/Makefile.in" - (("/bin/sh") (which "sh"))) - ;; TODO: Racket CS uses a fork of Chez Scheme. - ;; Most of this is copy-pasted from the "chez.scm", - ;; but maybe there's a way to reuse more directly. - (with-directory-excursion "src/ChezScheme" - (substitute* (find-files "mats" "Mf-.*") - (("^[[:space:]]+(cc ) *") "\tgcc ")) - (substitute* - (find-files "." (string-append - "(" - "Mf-[a-zA-Z0-9.]+" - "|Makefile[a-zA-Z0-9.]*" - "|checkin" - "|stex\\.stex" - "|newrelease" - "|workarea" - "|unix\\.ms" - "|^6\\.ms" - ;;"|[a-zA-Z0-9.]+\\.ms" ; guile can't read - ")")) - (("/bin/rm") (which "rm")) - (("/bin/ln") (which "ln")) - (("/bin/cp") (which "cp")) - (("/bin/echo") (which "echo"))) - (substitute* "makefiles/installsh" - (("/bin/true") (which "true")))) - #t)) (add-before 'configure 'pre-configure-minimal (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) (chdir "src") @@ -215,7 +185,7 @@ DrRacket IDE, are not included.") %installer-mirrors)) (sha256 (base32 - "047wpjblfzmf1msz7snrp2c2h0zxyzlmbsqr9bwsyvz3frcg0888")))) + "0xdqwrwm604bbnr97h75dps2ixxz2svlw0fn0f674bn04dcfd60f")))) (inputs `(;; sqlite and libraries for `racket/draw' are needed to build the doc. ("cairo" ,cairo)