Message ID | 20200620212802.31906-1-kuba@kadziolka.net |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Hello, Jakub Kądziołka <kuba@kadziolka.net> writes: > This patchstack builds upon #40283 and packages (some of) SageMath. > Currently, sagelib is built successfully, but the `sage' binary is not > being installed. I'm submitting this here as I'm no longer actively > working on this for now. Some things remain to be done: Thanks! Would it make sense to add the uncontroversial fourth first patches, along with #40283, so it is easier to hack on the sagemath package itself? I'm also Cc'ing Andreas Enge, who showed interest in packaging Sagemath a few months ago, and, AFAIK, was close to succeeding. Regards,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 02:47:28PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Jakub Kądziołka <kuba@kadziolka.net> writes: > > > This patchstack builds upon #40283 and packages (some of) SageMath. > > Currently, sagelib is built successfully, but the `sage' binary is not > > being installed. I'm submitting this here as I'm no longer actively > > working on this for now. Some things remain to be done: > > Thanks! > > Would it make sense to add the uncontroversial fourth first patches, > along with #40283, so it is easier to hack on the sagemath package > itself? Sure it would! I just did. > I'm also Cc'ing Andreas Enge, who showed interest in packaging Sagemath > a few months ago, and, AFAIK, was close to succeeding. Thanks! Regards, Jakub Kądziołka
Hello! Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> skribis: > Jakub Kądziołka <kuba@kadziolka.net> writes: > >> This patchstack builds upon #40283 and packages (some of) SageMath. >> Currently, sagelib is built successfully, but the `sage' binary is not >> being installed. I'm submitting this here as I'm no longer actively >> working on this for now. Some things remain to be done: > > Thanks! > > Would it make sense to add the uncontroversial fourth first patches, > along with #40283, so it is easier to hack on the sagemath package > itself? Time has passed, but it still sounds like a nice addition. Andreas, Nicolas: should one of you go ahead and apply part of these patches? Thanks, Ludo’.
Am Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:13:24PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > Would it make sense to add the uncontroversial fourth first patches, > > along with #40283, so it is easier to hack on the sagemath package > > itself? > Time has passed, but it still sounds like a nice addition. There is also https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56729 where I was waiting for a reply from the submitter, and/or Guillaume concerning the Lisp version with which Maxima is compiled. I would have to get back to both issues to see what the current status is, but could only do so in a week or two. Andreas
On 20/03/2023 15:13, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> skribis: > >> Would it make sense to add the uncontroversial fourth first patches, >> along with #40283, so it is easier to hack on the sagemath package >> itself? > > Time has passed, but it still sounds like a nice addition. > > Andreas, Nicolas: should one of you go ahead and apply part of these > patches? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. Wow, I wrote these patches like 2 genders and 3 distros ago :P FWIW, they did get pushed to master when you first suggested it, at commit db7f74d2eb4878c0a9ed8bb33853090752277370 and friends. Regards, Maya :3
Hi, Maja Kądziołka <kuba@kadziolka.net> skribis: > FWIW, they did get pushed to master when you first suggested it, at > commit db7f74d2eb4878c0a9ed8bb33853090752277370 and friends. Ooooh, right! My bad. Closing, thanks! Ludo’.