| Message ID | 20200419070445.1922-1-gfleury@disroot.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bug#40715] shepherd: doc: remove 'call/ec'. | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cbaines/applying patch | fail | View Laminar job |
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:04:45AM +0200, guy fleury iteriteka wrote: > * doc/shepherd.texi(call/ec): remove documentation. Thanks! > -@deffn {procedure} call/cc proc > -An alias for @code{call-with-current-continuation}. > -@end deffn Did you mean to also remove the call/cc part? It's not mentioned in the commit message...
hello, Le 21 avril 2020 18:58:40 UTC+02:00, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> a écrit : >On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:04:45AM +0200, guy fleury iteriteka wrote: >> * doc/shepherd.texi(call/ec): remove documentation. > >Thanks! > >> -@deffn {procedure} call/cc proc >> -An alias for @code{call-with-current-continuation}. >> -@end deffn > >Did you mean to also remove the call/cc part? It's not mentioned in the >commit message... This fallow my previous patch 6b0e1e1923107bdf5073f87649a724b7375808b0 applied by Ludo.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Guy-Fleury Iteriteka wrote: > hello, > > Le 21 avril 2020 18:58:40 UTC+02:00, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> a écrit : > >On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:04:45AM +0200, guy fleury iteriteka wrote: > >> * doc/shepherd.texi(call/ec): remove documentation. > > > >Thanks! > > > >> -@deffn {procedure} call/cc proc > >> -An alias for @code{call-with-current-continuation}. > >> -@end deffn > > > >Did you mean to also remove the call/cc part? It's not mentioned in the > >commit message... > > This fallow my previous patch 6b0e1e1923107bdf5073f87649a724b7375808b0 applied by Ludo. Yes, I noticed. But what about call/cc?
21 avril 2020 21:15 "Leo Famulari" <leo@famulari.name> a écrit: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:48:47PM +0200, Guy-Fleury Iteriteka wrote: > >> hello, >> >> Le 21 avril 2020 18:58:40 UTC+02:00, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> a écrit : >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:04:45AM +0200, guy fleury iteriteka wrote: >> * doc/shepherd.texi(call/ec): remove documentation. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -@deffn {procedure} call/cc proc >> -An alias for @code{call-with-current-continuation}. >> -@end deffn >> >> Did you mean to also remove the call/cc part? It's not mentioned in the >> commit message... >> >> This fallow my previous patch 6b0e1e1923107bdf5073f87649a724b7375808b0 applied by Ludo. > > Yes, I noticed. But what about call/cc? I see my err. I noticed that in Changelog 2003 they change the call 'call/cc' to 'call/ec'. Perhaps they forget to remove it in the doc. Any way see this update patch or adjust it correctly.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:07:57PM +0000, gfleury@disroot.org wrote: > I see my err. I noticed that in Changelog 2003 they change the call 'call/cc' to 'call/ec'. > Perhaps they forget to remove it in the doc. Any way see this update patch or adjust it correctly. Okay, thanks! Pushed as 1498f0bbf232b278aa9b22c97506feda5e04b76f
diff --git a/doc/shepherd.texi b/doc/shepherd.texi index 3e61f5d..5ecd716 100644 --- a/doc/shepherd.texi +++ b/doc/shepherd.texi @@ -1111,18 +1111,6 @@ warning messages. The current implementation is not very good, though. @end deffn -@deffn {procedure} call/cc proc -An alias for @code{call-with-current-continuation}. -@end deffn - -@deffn {procedure} call/ec proc -A simplistic implementation of the nonstandard, but popular procedure -@code{call-with-escape-continuation}, i.e. a @code{call/cc} for -outgoing continuations only. Note that the variant included in the Shepherd is -not aware of @code{dynamic-wind} at all and does not yet support -returning multiple values. -@end deffn - @cindex system errors @deffn {macro} without-system-error expr@dots{} Evaluates the @var{expr}s, not going further if a system error occurs,