Message ID | 20190626084338.3153-1-ludo@gnu.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: > This improves ‘guix search’ in two ways: > > 1. The relevance score now excludes things that do not match *all* > the regexps. So ‘guix search go game’ returns 28 results instead > of 1,245 and the first one is ‘gnugo’; ‘guix search ssh client’ > returns 14 results instead of 510; ‘guix search guile crypto’ > returns just ‘guile-gcrypt’ instead of 279 results. > > 2. ‘guix search’ and ‘guix system search’ now write at most a full > screen of results. You can pipe through a pager to view all the > results. Perfect, thank you for the patches! (I wonder why you chose to use “(cut > <> 0)” instead of “positive?” for checking if a value is greater than zero.) -- Ricardo
Hello! Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: > >> This improves ‘guix search’ in two ways: >> >> 1. The relevance score now excludes things that do not match *all* >> the regexps. So ‘guix search go game’ returns 28 results instead >> of 1,245 and the first one is ‘gnugo’; ‘guix search ssh client’ >> returns 14 results instead of 510; ‘guix search guile crypto’ >> returns just ‘guile-gcrypt’ instead of 279 results. >> >> 2. ‘guix search’ and ‘guix system search’ now write at most a full >> screen of results. You can pipe through a pager to view all the >> results. > > Perfect, thank you for the patches! It seems rather non-controversial. :-) Pushed: 4311cf965c ui: Add 'display-search-results' and use it. 4593f5a654 syscalls: Add 'terminal-rows'. 8874faaaac ui: 'relevance' considers regexps connected with a logical and. > (I wonder why you chose to use “(cut > <> 0)” instead of “positive?” for > checking if a value is greater than zero.) Actually no good reasons, I wanted to amend it and then forgot. Thanks, Ludo’.