| Message ID | 20190621122411.17847-1-mbakke@fastmail.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
Hi Marius, What is the status of this patch series [1]? 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36322> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 14:24, Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote: > With these patches, we can again cross-compile the bootstrap tarballs on > core-updates. > > As of commit bd0dc2df04a1550f41d3d5c7cc2c26ad12468b36, here are my > results for armhf and Hurd(!): > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf bootstrap-tarballs > /gnu/store/q245c0s6cc55ziamfxpv43lwbnxaw0n6-bootstrap-tarballs-0 > $ guix hash -rx $(!!) > 01lksw8qw973bc2lllz97pxm67x84rz8crbdiqwnlbyjq0j3mvaq > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=i586-pc-gnu bootstrap-tarballs > /gnu/store/4i3zxmzcrpg2h8inwgfd24sdsgan9jw7-bootstrap-tarballs-0 > $ guix hash -rx $(!!) > 17yjlqvwlv8v28qm5v888kshx30djylml9fgpwkcqvx3idzw7i1v > > Now, I haven't actually tried bootstrapping a system from these yet. > Do we have automated tests for that? I think the next action is waiting an answer for this question, eventually. :-) > Marius Bakke (4): > gnu: make-bootstrap: Remove obsolete header file. > gnu: make-bootstrap: Restore cross-compilation workarounds. > gnu: make-bootstrap: Adjust for GCC 7. > gnu: bootstrap-tarballs: Don't include the native mes when > cross-compiling. > > gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > guix/build/make-bootstrap.scm | 1 - > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) What would the next step? More tests? Merge into core-updates? Other? Cheers, simon
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skriver: > Hi Marius, > > What is the status of this patch series [1]? > > 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36322> [...] >> Marius Bakke (4): >> gnu: make-bootstrap: Remove obsolete header file. >> gnu: make-bootstrap: Restore cross-compilation workarounds. >> gnu: make-bootstrap: Adjust for GCC 7. >> gnu: bootstrap-tarballs: Don't include the native mes when >> cross-compiling. >> >> gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> guix/build/make-bootstrap.scm | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) This series is long obsolete, closing! Thanks for the reminder. :-)
With these patches, we can again cross-compile the bootstrap tarballs on core-updates. As of commit bd0dc2df04a1550f41d3d5c7cc2c26ad12468b36, here are my results for armhf and Hurd(!): $ ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=arm-linux-gnueabihf bootstrap-tarballs /gnu/store/q245c0s6cc55ziamfxpv43lwbnxaw0n6-bootstrap-tarballs-0 $ guix hash -rx $(!!) 01lksw8qw973bc2lllz97pxm67x84rz8crbdiqwnlbyjq0j3mvaq $ ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=i586-pc-gnu bootstrap-tarballs /gnu/store/4i3zxmzcrpg2h8inwgfd24sdsgan9jw7-bootstrap-tarballs-0 $ guix hash -rx $(!!) 17yjlqvwlv8v28qm5v888kshx30djylml9fgpwkcqvx3idzw7i1v Now, I haven't actually tried bootstrapping a system from these yet. Do we have automated tests for that? Marius Bakke (4): gnu: make-bootstrap: Remove obsolete header file. gnu: make-bootstrap: Restore cross-compilation workarounds. gnu: make-bootstrap: Adjust for GCC 7. gnu: bootstrap-tarballs: Don't include the native mes when cross-compiling. gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- guix/build/make-bootstrap.scm | 1 - 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)