| Message ID | 20190430222521.6101-1-jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes: > There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing > the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What > adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats, > and working with lcms. > > wednesday (1): > gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs. > > gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now.
Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> writes: > wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes: > >> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing >> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What >> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats, >> and working with lcms. >> >> wednesday (1): >> gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs. >> >> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does > not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am > curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather > 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now. No objections from me. Emacs already has 'lcms' in its closure so there would be no size difference.
Hi,
Looking at old submission, it appears that
<http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35516>
had fallen into the cracks.
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 at 18:21, Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> wrote:
> Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> writes:
>> wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes:
>>
>>> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing
>>> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What
>>> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats,
>>> and working with lcms.
>>>
>>> wednesday (1):
>>> gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs.
>>>
>>> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does
>> not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am
>> curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather
>> 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now.
>
> No objections from me. Emacs already has 'lcms' in its closure so there
> would be no size difference.
Marius, since you have commit access, could you push this change? And
thus close this. :-)
Cheers,
simon
Hi, Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> writes: > Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> writes: > >> wednesday <jessejohngildersleve@zohomail.eu> writes: >> >>> There is not much of a need or reason for this, other than futher completing >>> the TODO, which after this and my other patches I think may be complete. What >>> adding this does is add a few elisp functions for converting to some formats, >>> and working with lcms. >>> >>> wednesday (1): >>> gnu: emacs: Add lcms to inputs. >>> >>> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> Hi, I know this patch is quite old but our Emacs currently still does >> not have LCMS support. LCMS was introduced in the 26 release, and I am >> curious if anybody had any thoughts on adding this? From what I gather >> 27 is due to be marked as stable any week now. > > No objections from me. Emacs already has 'lcms' in its closure so there > would be no size difference. Applied to staging with fd5b7393a0. Closing; thank you! Maxim