diff mbox series

[bug#68257] gnu: mesa: Build asahi driver on aarch64.

Message ID 1db5dc8e6e124b6c500f1e60b1f895bf95638169.1704451324.git.roman@burningswell.com
State New
Headers show
Series [bug#68257] gnu: mesa: Build asahi driver on aarch64. | expand

Commit Message

Roman Scherer Jan. 5, 2024, 10:53 a.m. UTC
* gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Build asahi driver on aarch64.

Change-Id: I597e70732b9ebd18960131f1b664b2dc83683b8e
---
 gnu/packages/gl.scm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: ac69b423865f12310cef5662d9c303aa4b90c869

Comments

Mathieu Othacehe Jan. 7, 2024, 8:02 p.m. UTC | #1
> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Build asahi driver on aarch64.

Applied, thanks,

Mathieu
Mathieu Othacehe Jan. 8, 2024, 8:54 a.m. UTC | #2
Hey,

> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Build asahi driver on aarch64.

I reverted it from master, as it would probably be best fitted for
mesa-updates, John?

Thanks,

Mathieu
Roman Scherer Jan. 10, 2024, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Mathieu,

thanks for taking a look at this.

It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" on Debuggs.
How can we proceed with this?

Roman


On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> Hey,
>
> > * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Build asahi driver on aarch64.
>
> I reverted it from master, as it would probably be best fitted for
> mesa-updates, John?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
Mathieu Othacehe Jan. 10, 2024, 1:23 p.m. UTC | #4
Hello,

> It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" on Debuggs.
> How can we proceed with this?

I will re-open it as soon as debbugs is back.

Mathieu
Roman Scherer Jan. 10, 2024, 1:27 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Mathieu,

ok, thank you. If there's anything I can do to move this forward, please
let me know.

Thanks for your help!

Roman


On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:23 PM Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> > It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" on Debuggs.
> > How can we proceed with this?
>
> I will re-open it as soon as debbugs is back.
>
> Mathieu
>
John Kehayias Jan. 16, 2024, 1:34 a.m. UTC | #6
Hello Roman,

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:27 PM, Roman Scherer wrote:

> Hi Mathieu,
>
> ok, thank you. If there's anything I can do to move this forward, please let me know.
>

I see you just sent a message about applying this on core-updates. I think that can be fine since everything is being rebuilt there, if they don't mind an unrelated patch. I don't see any issues with adding a driver, but I'm not familiar much with aarch64.

As for mesa-updates, I think the next round will be when mesa 24 hits stable. They say that should be early February? Anyway, probably about a month out. Happy to include this patch there if it doesn't make it for core-updates.

John

> Thanks for your help!
>
> Roman
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:23 PM Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>
>  > It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" on Debuggs.
>  > How can we proceed with this?
>
>  I will re-open it as soon as debbugs is back.
>
>  Mathieu
Roman Scherer Jan. 16, 2024, 4:14 p.m. UTC | #7
Hi John,

thanks for your messages. Yes, let's see what happens with this patch in
the core-updates branch.
You are right, that it is a bit unrelated. I was only thinking about the
large rebuild that is probably happening because of jemalloc, not that that
branch got a new purpose.

If it does not get merged with it, I would appreciate the patch being
included in the next mesa-updates round.

Roman

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:35 AM John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Roman,
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:27 PM, Roman Scherer wrote:
>
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > ok, thank you. If there's anything I can do to move this forward, please
> let me know.
> >
>
> I see you just sent a message about applying this on core-updates. I think
> that can be fine since everything is being rebuilt there, if they don't
> mind an unrelated patch. I don't see any issues with adding a driver, but
> I'm not familiar much with aarch64.
>
> As for mesa-updates, I think the next round will be when mesa 24 hits
> stable. They say that should be early February? Anyway, probably about a
> month out. Happy to include this patch there if it doesn't make it for
> core-updates.
>
> John
>
> > Thanks for your help!
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:23 PM Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >  Hello,
> >
> >  > It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" on Debuggs.
> >  > How can we proceed with this?
> >
> >  I will re-open it as soon as debbugs is back.
> >
> >  Mathieu
>
>
Maxim Cournoyer Jan. 24, 2024, 3:19 p.m. UTC | #8
Hi,

Roman Scherer <roman@burningswell.com> writes:

> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Build asahi driver on aarch64.
>
> Change-Id: I597e70732b9ebd18960131f1b664b2dc83683b8e

Applied to core-updates in 95ed0b144ceccf5790ab377d13e0d514a7411993.
Roman Scherer Jan. 24, 2024, 3:28 p.m. UTC | #9
Thank you Maxim!

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, 16:19 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Roman Scherer <roman@burningswell.com> writes:
>
> > * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Build asahi driver on aarch64.
> >
> > Change-Id: I597e70732b9ebd18960131f1b664b2dc83683b8e
>
> Applied to core-updates in 95ed0b144ceccf5790ab377d13e0d514a7411993.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>
Maxim Cournoyer Jan. 24, 2024, 7:19 p.m. UTC | #10
Hi Roman,

Roman Scherer <roman@burningswell.com> writes:

> Thank you Maxim!

Thanks for the patches -- keep them coming!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gnu/packages/gl.scm b/gnu/packages/gl.scm
index b0ee413acd..9d1a8a1e72 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gl.scm
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@  (define-public mesa
          #$@(cond
              ((target-aarch64?)
               ;; TODO: Fix svga driver for non-Intel architectures.
-              '("-Dgallium-drivers=etnaviv,freedreno,kmsro,lima,nouveau,\
+              '("-Dgallium-drivers=asahi,etnaviv,freedreno,kmsro,lima,nouveau,\
 panfrost,r300,r600,swrast,tegra,v3d,vc4,virgl"))
              ((target-arm32?)
               ;; Freedreno FTBFS when built on a 64-bit machine.