Message ID | cover.1743241966.git.andreas@enge.fr |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 1B21927BBEA; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:58:18 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE, SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A776127BBE2 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:58:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1tySx9-0006kH-Oc; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:58:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tySx1-0006jj-Jp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:58:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tySx0-0001ga-P5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:58:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject; bh=0S6jT7YuuY0BXSl9EYOr/YGKhLdxM3+61TdKNMYOyco=; b=Qs8vPJbyCkmexayX53Tpl9LTRCSvySpiKkjScy/etHUnCT/9DmoocagEaRv6ryBf2TNUbjM+DBktZJGnk1Z0uX26dSTjvEsm9dIvvj5o6fZR76MWEgzv4WnUvHoslF8zh8lSv8Gw0cTDUcdCku02d3uxKoKrad2stQ1fF+XNxvFGFJc+mRsCSXBZBwqGlo7tsrP2hmE4586anEJpKyY68KIKZCDTwwX+FJ8h4q0LKIJ9kK5HQAz44RHV4pwRqKoda2TZ5TKPvHBguNJgpK4W5SvuX44DqeYAj0j6XOvF31FbhzpHzEikkV6LCUfXyLMSJkcUvtdSKg2pN9fBDqKsIw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tySx0-0006KU-KO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#77357] [PATCH 0/1] Remove freebayes Resent-From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.77357.B.174324226824288@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 77357 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 77357@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: rekado@elephly.net, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.174324226824288 (code B ref -1); Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:58:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2025 09:57:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56953 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tySwm-0006Jf-6K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:57:48 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:46170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1tySwj-0006JD-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:57:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1tySwW-0006i0-EC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:57:32 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1tySwU-0001f8-9V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 05:57:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59045155; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:57:25 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Z2LdBl_g_xG; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:57:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong.lan (176-179-191-150.abo.bbox.fr [176.179.191.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83AB2297; Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:57:23 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:52:45 +0100 Message-ID: <cover.1743241966.git.andreas@enge.fr> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 59045155 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.40 / 15.00]; SPAM_FLAG(5.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_SPAM(3.00)[1.000]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[m:andreas@enge.fr,s:andreas.enge@aquilenet.fr]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Action: add header X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Spam: Yes Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.233.100.1; envelope-from=andreas@enge.fr; helo=hera.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Remove freebayes
|
|
Message
Andreas Enge
March 29, 2025, 9:52 a.m. UTC
I noticed that the package does not build when updating parallel. It should be possible to somehow repair it, but apparently nobody has noticed that the package does not build any more for almost two years: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/9529724/details first failure: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1171985/details So if there is no interest in it, there is maybe no point in spending time on it. I would suggest to remove it on or after April 29. Andreas Enge (1): gnu: Remove freebayes. gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 82 --------------------------------- 1 file changed, 82 deletions(-) base-commit: 67f4a2feadbb6cc04a61b5a3bc7b8f4bace2a0bb
Comments
I made a mistake in submitting the patch series; the (trivial) patch is in #77358, which I have closed; we can continue the discussion here. Andreas
Dear Andreas, I know I have a manifest somewhere depending on freebayes. However, I am unsure when was the last time I ran it. And even then I could use time-machine to get a working version of freebayes running. So removing it is not a big deal. However, it seems that upstream is aware of the failing test suite [1]. Unfortubnately building --with-latest=freebayes did not immediately lead me to success. Perhaps what should be discussed is the potential overlap (at leat conceptually) between the guix channel bioinformatic tools (as found in bioinformatics.scm) and the many more tools in the guix-science channel. Would it make sense to move all these packages over to the guix-science channel? Best Sebastian [1]: https://github.com/freebayes/freebayes/issues/786