Message ID | cover.1733614983.git.noelopez@free.fr |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id C71F927BBEA; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:29:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE, SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A2027BBE2 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:29:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1tKGPK-0001LT-IN; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:29:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tKGPI-0001H5-2b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:29:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tKGPH-00077R-Jv; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:29:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject; bh=aIppDwRFDxhXEpizIiCclEHEFbAUV1wdJKfC3f7jb1k=; b=BCe1MtGVroPUSbvRl9eUXR/AaJqIQ7mmrUxC6BNtczHbc1DUzk4faROfS3LvyfZ6ZlPGX5LNpj9yhLELxQp7TfB9OSYu+DMF8rIcc52zguHZNHFxwxTYsTGZZ+IXwGo2SBxiqUEF6PGhdvk5kNcC8v+5oIZ1PSyN82pXWzvmE5zxrpRV+AUZLUzpfF7D81dLaNK/vFPrrqUxnjUp9nplO3kmRN4LqshPEtaNnwZDqTqUu9pOlPQ2IquizoNPg+wj3WCaUwlSyqroWvOcU4VcHn/XxyLG1U9Ex0yeS+5rz4TJXzTk+utMlhctq01YsI8gEesmSD+o15rGiqeMe6nxag==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tKGPG-0006Z3-HO; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process. Resent-From: =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@xn--no-cja.eu> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, mail@cbanes.net, ludo@gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 12:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.74736.B.173366093925217@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 74736 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 74736@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noelopez@free.fr>, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>, Christopher Baines <mail@cbanes.net>, Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org> X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>, Christopher Baines <mail@cbanes.net>, Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org> Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.173366093925217 (code B ref -1); Sun, 08 Dec 2024 12:29:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2024 12:28:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tKGPC-0006Yf-Mz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:28:58 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <noe@xn--no-cja.eu>) id 1tKGPB-0006YV-1g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:28:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noe@xn--no-cja.eu>) id 1tKGPA-0001GS-Ja for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:28:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no ([2a01:5b40:0:3006::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <noe@xn--no-cja.eu>) id 1tKGP8-000767-Dy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:28:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xn--no-cja.eu; s=ds202402; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aIppDwRFDxhXEpizIiCclEHEFbAUV1wdJKfC3f7jb1k=; b=X0Dw6mnMZyIBwYMLDmG60+bAtF E+W4OnBvXf56wxbC/m2qeRRaz0bjCG5l0pMZ/CtQoR1j1EDhZpNnBDHiNoY7JvtGIQNEz3n3//lMU lFpSeqCkVazjbNsSSrFU8WZciOGVvd0UDHgEXF5U/qMJmCres3i4I1GNe9t2D+ezkOg4QGtTy4vtQ h5abx1X2FaPCfcLseNKSCR5MXMeWuTvbPClLkRqZaXKjC3YnryCXEc8WpTirtMm9XlQGB1jhamA90 bphvi+rlnV5TcpRUnjXkvxHhj33xT/AxH/mMU9T4aJPWPu7nE7nNkfLNlisHY2QUSPhoDwa/MGGYS PMlLJcAw==; Received: from smtp by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) id 1tKGOz-000b6N-Lu; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 13:28:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 13:29:52 +0100 Message-ID: <cover.1733614983.git.noelopez@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:5b40:0:3006::1; envelope-from=noe@xn--no-cja.eu; helo=smtp.domeneshop.no X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-to: =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez <noe@xn--no-cja.eu> X-ACL-Warn: , =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9_Lopez_via_Guix-patches?= <guix-patches@gnu.org> From: =?utf-8?q?No=C3=A9_Lopez_via_Guix-patches?= via <guix-patches@gnu.org> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Add Request-For-Comment process.
|
|
Message
Noé Lopez
Dec. 8, 2024, 12:29 p.m. UTC
From: Noé Lopez <noelopez@free.fr>
Hi,
It has been more than a year since Simon Tournier’s original patch[1] for
specifying a “request for comment” process. I believe that such a process can
pave the way for big changes to make their way to Guix and the establishment
of a governance model, among other things.
Therefore, I have taken it upon myself to produce an updated version taking
into account the comments received on the original patch and my own changes.
These changes are targeted not only to committers, but to every contributor so
that anyone can propose important changes. So anyone should feel free to
comment what they think :)
Have a good day,
Noé Lopez
[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66844
Simon Tournier (1):
rfc: Add Request-For-Comment process.
rfc/0000-template.txt | 76 +++++++++++++
rfc/0001-rfc-process.txt | 232 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 308 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 rfc/0000-template.txt
create mode 100644 rfc/0001-rfc-process.txt
base-commit: 1affd2b5aa7f5467a44cf757c4fc0c6956d3f3c9
Comments
Hello Noé Lopez, thanks for pushing this idea forward! I think that the RFC process will help to track all the major initiatives in GNU Guix -- present and future ones. I know that there are several long-term big projects inside Guix, namely Guile daemon, distributed substitutes and maybe more. In my view the problem is that the information about those projects is buried in the Git branches and E-Mail discussions. Maybe RFCs in the well-known place inside the repository will help developers to see what the community at large is up to. > # Ludovic Courtès: > # I’d go for one format, preferably Markdown because we have a library to > # parse it. To my taste, as for Emacs user, the plain old org-mode format is good enough to write RFCs, but that's no more than a preference. Many people using Markdown nowadays so maybe it will help to make the RFC process more friendly for newcomers. - avp