Message ID | cover.1714438234.git.aecepoglu@fastmail.fm |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | gnu: bqn: Update cbqn. | expand |
Am Dienstag, dem 30.04.2024 um 01:50 +0100 schrieb aecepoglu: > Applied feedback received. > > I am not sure on how to package Singeli differently. It's a directory > tree of BQN code that the author would like to think is a library. I > think it functions better as an executable, one that relies on BQN > itself. > Is this an issue we can revisit later? I would also like to have it as an executable relying on BQN. There's a few things you can do if you need them for bootstrapping. You could for example take (package-source singeli) as an input where only the sources are required. For packaging singeli itself; assuming you don't need to AOT-compile, I'd suggest you go with a plan along the lines of singeli → bin (don't forget to wrap-program) include → include/singeli doc → doc/singeli data → share/singeli *.bqn → lib/bqn The singeli bin is possibly somewhat special, as you need to also supply bqn. Not sure what the smartest move here is; I'd personally try to use $(which bqn) with a fallback to a known good one. Cheers