Message ID | cover.1684647790.git.a.r.draidi@redscript.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Restyle and update xmrig to 6.19.2 | expand |
I didn't apply patch 1, as the restyling doesn't seem necessary in this case. Patch 2 applied as 7b3f571fc8e3fbb3fefc30ebe53ad074c30653a8 with a complete commit message. Thanks.
Hello, On 5/21/23 12:30, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > I didn't apply patch 1, as the restyling doesn't seem necessary in this > case. Out of curiosity, when would it be appropriate to send a "restyle" patch? > Patch 2 applied as 7b3f571fc8e3fbb3fefc30ebe53ad074c30653a8 with > a complete commit message. > Thanks. Thanks!
A <a@redscript.org> skribis: > Hello, > > On 5/21/23 12:30, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> I didn't apply patch 1, as the restyling doesn't seem necessary in this >> case. > Out of curiosity, when would it be appropriate to send a "restyle" patch? >> Patch 2 applied as 7b3f571fc8e3fbb3fefc30ebe53ad074c30653a8 with >> a complete commit message. >> Thanks. > Thanks! Restyling is usually done when a package is still using the old style with labels for inputs, when it is using quasiquote forms for arguments and using gexps would simplify things, or when it has very long lines (more than 80 characters).