Message ID | cover.1671527962.git.h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Refresh to specific version | expand |
Hi, Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> skribis: >> In Guix, “package spec” refers to the syntax that >> ‘specification->package’ accepts, like “guile” or “guile@2.2”. So we’ll >> have to use another name throughout. How about “update spec” or >> “refresh spec” for the string, and just “update” for the record? > > Using "update" resulted in a conflict with the existing "update-package" > function. Using "refesh" would have names the accessor "refresh-package", > which sounds irritating for me (same for "update". Thus I decided to call the > record "update-spec" and the function "update-string->update.spec" (the name > is use only once). > > WDYT? Sounds good! >> Since there are just two fields, it may be simpler to use SRFI-9: > > Done. > > I also tested the patches with (an updated version of) the test-script I > posted in the first version of the series. Excellent. I posted suggestions for the last patch (doc); you can adjust it and push the whole series. Thank you! Ludo’.
Hi, Many thanks for the review. I followed your latest suggestions. and pushed as 7c476873e0300711bf92668cf01abd28f7295ead