Message ID | 877eenqy8f.fsf@cbaines.net |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improve the upower-service style. | expand |
Hello! Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis: > These patches update the style of the upower-service. Improving and > documenting the <upower-configuration> record, and deprecating the > upower-service procedure. > > Directly using record types as default values for service types, along > with default values for the fields in the record type is generally more > flexible and configurable than using procedures for service > configuration. It means that the configuration for the service can be > changed programatically by generating new configuration based off of the > original configuration, rather than having to rerun the procedure that > created the configuration in the first place. > > > Christopher Baines (3): > services: Improve the upower-configuration record. > services: Improve the upower-service-type. > services: desktop: Deprecate the upower-service procedure. All three patches LGTM. Thanks for taking the time to do this! :-) Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: > Hello! > > Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis: > >> These patches update the style of the upower-service. Improving and >> documenting the <upower-configuration> record, and deprecating the >> upower-service procedure. >> >> Directly using record types as default values for service types, along >> with default values for the fields in the record type is generally more >> flexible and configurable than using procedures for service >> configuration. It means that the configuration for the service can be >> changed programatically by generating new configuration based off of the >> original configuration, rather than having to rerun the procedure that >> created the configuration in the first place. >> >> >> Christopher Baines (3): >> services: Improve the upower-configuration record. >> services: Improve the upower-service-type. >> services: desktop: Deprecate the upower-service procedure. > > All three patches LGTM. Thanks for taking the time to do this! :-) Great, I've pushed these patches to master now :)