Message ID | 20230211103537.24139-1-maya.tomasek@disroot.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | gnu: zrythm: Update to 1.0.0-beta.4.5.62 | expand |
Hi, Thanks for working on this. I'm the Zrythm author and was also the person who first packaged this but I don't use Guix anymore. Feel free to ask if you need help related to building/running. From a packager's standpoint I think the unreleased Carla package should probably be separate from stable Carla. > I tried to compile Zrythm with -Dalsa=enabled, which didn't make Alsa > available as a backend. The pure Alsa backend is broken so I disabled it. You can enable the rtaudio dependency for ALSA/pulseaudio support (it acts as a wrapper). Thanks, Alex
Hi Maya, Could you look into the suggestions Alexandros made (I agree regarding Carla) and send a v2 of the patch series? It looks almost ready to apply! Thanks, Ludo’. Alexandros Theodotou <alex@zrythm.org> skribis: > Hi, > > Thanks for working on this. I'm the Zrythm author and was also the > person who first packaged this but I don't use Guix anymore. Feel free > to ask if you need help related to building/running. > >>From a packager's standpoint I think the unreleased Carla package > should probably be separate from stable Carla. > >> I tried to compile Zrythm with -Dalsa=enabled, which didn't make Alsa >> available as a backend. > > The pure Alsa backend is broken so I disabled it. You can enable the > rtaudio dependency for ALSA/pulseaudio support (it acts as a wrapper). > > Thanks, > Alex
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: Hi Ludo', > Hi Maya, > > Could you look into the suggestions Alexandros made (I agree regarding > Carla) and send a v2 of the patch series? Certainly! Should I open it as another patch? I am not certain how these things work. From Antero Mejr (the previous person to update the package): > (module-ref (resolve-interface ... 'libbacktrace) > was a quick workaround to avoid an cyclical import. It's not ideal and > I'm not sure if the maintainers would find it to be acceptable. Is that line fine? Or should I find some other fix? Regards Maya
Hi Mája, Mája Tomášek <maya.tomasek@disroot.org> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: > > Hi Ludo', > >> Hi Maya, >> >> Could you look into the suggestions Alexandros made (I agree regarding >> Carla) and send a v2 of the patch series? > > Certainly! Should I open it as another patch? I am not certain how these > things work. You don’t need to open a new bug. Instead, create the messages with: git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH v2" … and send them all to 61423@debbugs.gnu.org. > From Antero Mejr (the previous person to update the package): >> (module-ref (resolve-interface ... 'libbacktrace) >> was a quick workaround to avoid an cyclical import. It's not ideal and >> I'm not sure if the maintainers would find it to be acceptable. > > Is that line fine? Or should I find some other fix? No it’s not fine, it should be treated like other packages. If that causes problem, then we’ll see, but it shouldn’t. Thanks, Ludo’.