mbox series

[bug#51455,0/2] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.11.

Message ID 20211028070206.10621-1-tanguy@bioneland.org
Headers show
Series gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.11. | expand

Message

Tanguy LE CARROUR Oct. 28, 2021, 7:02 a.m. UTC 
Hi Guix,

I haven't contributed in a very loooong time, so I picked an easy one to
resume my contributions!

Regarding package `poetry`, `guix lint` tell me that I should remove
`python-pip` from the inputs, but if I do so, I break `poetry`. Is there
a way to silence this warning?

Best regards,
Tanguy


Tanguy Le Carrour (2):
  gnu: python-poetry-core: Update to 1.0.7.
  gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.11.

 gnu/packages/python-build.scm | 4 ++--
 gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm   | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Ludovic Courtès Nov. 10, 2021, 11:21 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi!

Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> skribis:

> I haven't contributed in a very loooong time, so I picked an easy one to
> resume my contributions!

Welcome back!  :-)

> Regarding package `poetry`, `guix lint` tell me that I should remove
> `python-pip` from the inputs, but if I do so, I break `poetry`. Is there
> a way to silence this warning?

No, but if false positives are common, we should either fix (guix lint)
or add a package property to silent it (similar to the ‘lint-hidden-cve’
property).

> Tanguy Le Carrour (2):
>   gnu: python-poetry-core: Update to 1.0.7.
>   gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.11.

Applied, thanks!

Ludo’.
Tanguy LE CARROUR Nov. 12, 2021, 8:12 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Ludo’,

Thanks for reviewing!


Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2021-11-11 00:21:08)
> Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> skribis:
> 
> > I haven't contributed in a very loooong time, so I picked an easy one to
> > resume my contributions!
> 
> Welcome back!  :-)

Thanks! I'm happy to be back after some busy months!


> > Regarding package `poetry`, `guix lint` tell me that I should remove
> > `python-pip` from the inputs, but if I do so, I break `poetry`. Is there
> > a way to silence this warning?
> 
> No, but if false positives are common, we should either fix (guix lint)
> or add a package property to silent it (similar to the ‘lint-hidden-cve’
> property).

Nothing that I can contribute a patch to, but… I'll keep it in mind!


Regards,