Message ID | 20210603072958.13424-1-ludo@gnu.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Generalized cache support and improved graft caching | expand |
Hi Ludo’!
> Feedback welcome, including performance reports!
I can confirm this further improves the situation around `guix
environment --ad-hoc r-learnr`. The additive behavior from my initial
report is also gone for r-learnr and r-stm, but not for r-learnr and
jupyter. I’m assuming the last two don’t share alot of grafts/packages
and thus don’t benefit from caching.
Thanks,
Lars
Hi! Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net> skribis: >> Feedback welcome, including performance reports! > I can confirm this further improves the situation around `guix > environment --ad-hoc r-learnr`. The additive behavior from my initial > report is also gone for r-learnr and r-stm, but not for r-learnr and > jupyter. I’m assuming the last two don’t share alot of grafts/packages > and thus don’t benefit from caching. Yes, most likely. Thanks for testing! Ludo’.
Hi, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net> skribis: >> Feedback welcome, including performance reports! > I can confirm this further improves the situation around `guix > environment --ad-hoc r-learnr`. The additive behavior from my initial > report is also gone for r-learnr and r-stm, but not for r-learnr and > jupyter. I’m assuming the last two don’t share alot of grafts/packages > and thus don’t benefit from caching. Pushed as 0c109026093e6fa8730efe0d7454656275d6efe3! Thanks, Ludo’.