| Message ID | 20210527123259.4115-1-ludo@gnu.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Documenting commit reverts and revocation | expand |
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 02:32:59PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > Attached is an attempt to: > > 1. Structure the “Commit Access” section of the manual; > > 2. Document how to address committers’ mistakes, when to revert > commits; > > 3. Explain under what circumstances maintainers may revoke commit > rights. > > It essentially codifies unwritten rules, but as always, I think it’s > better to be explicit about the rules and community expectations. > > Let me know what you think! I propose to leave a comment period > of at least one week, possibly iterating with new versions. Thanks for putting this together. It looks good to me!
Ludovic Courtès 写道： > It essentially codifies unwritten rules, but as always, I think > it’s > better to be explicit about the rules and community > expectations. Looks good to me modulo obvious typos like the ‘called’ pointed out by Julien. I *don't* think the text assigns too much potential blame. Responsibility, yes. Thanks Ludo'! T G-R
Hello Guix! Attached is an attempt to: 1. Structure the “Commit Access” section of the manual; 2. Document how to address committers’ mistakes, when to revert commits; 3. Explain under what circumstances maintainers may revoke commit rights. It essentially codifies unwritten rules, but as always, I think it’s better to be explicit about the rules and community expectations. Let me know what you think! I propose to leave a comment period of at least one week, possibly iterating with new versions. Ludo’. Ludovic Courtès (3): doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section. doc: Add "Addressing Mistakes" section. doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation. doc/contributing.texi | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)