Message ID | cover.1590259641.git.h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add pEp (pretty Easy privacy) | expand |
Hi Guix, I'm still seeking advice on how to name these packages. Shall I keep the names I'm currently using, or are there any other suggestions? Am 23.05.20 um 20:48 schrieb Hartmut Goebel: > This adds the build tools and libraries for pretty Easy Privacy, a library for > automatic key management and encryption of messages. > > How shall we name the packages here? > I'd appreciate feedback to the package names, since the original packages have > quiet uncommon names: > > - pEpEngine -> pep-engine (main library) > - libpEpAdapter -> intermediate layer library > - pEpPythonAdapter -> python-pep-adapter > - pEpJNIAdapter -> java-pep-adapter > > The project as other packages like these: > - pEpQtAdapter > - pEpJSONServerAdapter > - pEpObjCAdapter > > In Arch Linux AUR packages are named pep-engine, libpep-adapter, > python-pep-adapter, pep-jni-adapter, pep-qt-adapter.
Hi Guix, I'm still seeking advice on how to name these packages, since the original packages have quiet uncommon names. Shall I keep the names I'm currently using, or are there any other suggestions? Current names: pep-engine libpepadapter. python-pep-adapter java-pep-adapter Am 23.05.20 um 20:48 schrieb Hartmut Goebel: > How shall we name the packages here? > I'd appreciate feedback to the package names, since the original packages have > quiet uncommon names: > > - pEpEngine -> pep-engine (main library) > - libpEpAdapter -> intermediate layer library > - pEpPythonAdapter -> python-pep-adapter > - pEpJNIAdapter -> java-pep-adapter > > The project as other packages like these: > - pEpQtAdapter > - pEpJSONServerAdapter > - pEpObjCAdapter > > In Arch Linux AUR packages are named pep-engine, libpep-adapter, > python-pep-adapter, pep-jni-adapter, pep-qt-adapter.
Hi Hartmut, Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> skribis: > I'm still seeking advice on how to name these packages, since the > original packages have > quiet uncommon names. Shall I keep the names I'm currently using, or are > there any other suggestions? > > Current names: > > pep-engine > libpepadapter. > python-pep-adapter > java-pep-adapter That LGTM, I think it’s pretty much in line with: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Package-Naming.html Thanks, Ludo’.
Hi Ludo,
> That LGTM, I think it’s pretty much in line with:
Thanks.
Pushed as 3cf7088fc646e07158914dea1314151123472ec2