Message ID | 06d641635020158f92e009ad1a58b2f1830a9709.1741010255.git.monego@posteo.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Delivered-To: patchwork@mira.cbaines.net Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id D6D1227BBE9; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:05:11 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E523927BBE2 for <patchwork@mira.cbaines.net>; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:05:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1tp6Nu-0005x7-RZ; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:03:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tp6Nr-0005u9-Q9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:03:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tp6Nq-00051k-Un for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:03:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:From:To:Subject; bh=pTsEwjVuH8kaiHmRIeRwD2amTTg7R/lrbpCgXSYizGM=; b=Z6IL5F0WPAoc7jpSi6u+UpFAE8sqBFtljCt+/H0TIZw9QtW1hABFVEQe4ybwDxjrwwcUA1ON5KCKfm/6qrlbaWE3mT4WHHSslPMDMRr6mhRMXHvKvgsCNy+VQePAW2J++bUNO8Xs8RIodf5o2L6esCHkJGcMqrHHjysi3dTHisN9NXILFhBHSTjT1uLpxX5y4Sqn+D7ApOCynrO/K7+HTT11DC4Qby8UJBWZrHOw2/dD+7gUP2dSe06Xs5kZ75ZbUAgurelRiEbd3ToegsWhjCTIvVXnEJoDKUGB1dyI7Nzlo09s4EEKdUNyTLY1hz1U985r+TOC71zVWQwElfk1+Q==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tp6Nq-0005BI-Cw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#76712] [PATCH 1/7] gnu: vips: Build with OpenEXR 3. Resent-From: Vinicius Monego <monego@posteo.net> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 14:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.76712.B76712.174101056519817@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 76712 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 76712@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Vinicius Monego <monego@posteo.net> Received: via spool by 76712-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B76712.174101056519817 (code B ref 76712); Mon, 03 Mar 2025 14:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 76712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2025 14:02:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1tp6NY-00059W-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:02:44 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:51073) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <monego@posteo.net>) id 1tp6NV-00058z-AZ for 76712@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:02:42 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F75C240027 for <76712@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:02:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1741010555; bh=2j5HWp46QDCo1xNR0d+i5pVI1xuJ76g2Jg2Znnow2GM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=DQRK4762HMIfMChjLKCEz9Sup66OEu/4AcnMxbPgV6suoVqHgPSrg0WiBCXErO7zQ fI1DMm0p4bHvOomFJ/Mb535J9jhPO+21G0rUqtmAVrFq899udYlIp+8IuJolkJUY3m O0KXYZF/pkbNFgwTtFW4zLTDc6Za7Kf5ARBkRDUYF2PqPzZL61MUsJun9yApKPJron tjur14e7Rdu27nyvyDIOXhyYXM0sG46gnIMpKHlLuy+J3RupLmMyJ6ecgty589B19f M7j92PS6x4y7cyZwCrjnI4AfnTNbhJfGcuRoeHRAg9vUDgniD3i9+aHtBk29h59nSC Y64EDwbTkBWLA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Z60rB3FVvz9rxB; Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:02:33 +0100 (CET) From: Vinicius Monego <monego@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:02:09 +0000 Message-ID: <06d641635020158f92e009ad1a58b2f1830a9709.1741010255.git.monego@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: <cover.1741010255.git.monego@posteo.net> References: <cover.1741010255.git.monego@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches> List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>, <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+patchwork=mira.cbaines.net@gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: Patches |
Series |
Refactor and update libvips-related packages
|
|
Commit Message
Vinicius Monego
March 3, 2025, 2:02 p.m. UTC
* gnu/packages/image-processing.scm (vips)[inputs]: Replace openexr-2 by openexr. Change-Id: I47fe672a7f9f27abe8e8b5d286ea00c1643e5c9f --- gnu/packages/image-processing.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Hello Vinicius, would you like to take up this patch set again? There is a slightly newer patch release of vips. Concerning propagated inputs, I am not sure whether moving is the correct approach. I understood that packages required during build additionally need to be present as regular inputs. But this should be easy to test. In any case, it would be helpful to add a comment why inputs are propagated (for instance, a reference to the vips.pc file). Since you have commit rights, please feel free to push the patches yourself once you have made sure that all depending packages build. Thanks, Andreas
Em 01/05/2025 04:11, Andreas Enge escreveu: > Hello Vinicius, Hello Andreas, > would you like to take up this patch set again? > There is a slightly newer patch release of vips. > > Concerning propagated inputs, I am not sure whether moving is the > correct approach. I understood that packages required during build > additionally need to be present as regular inputs. But this should > be easy to test. In any case, it would be helpful to add a comment > why inputs are propagated (for instance, a reference to the vips.pc > file). I'm not sure whether this is documented, but it seems to be the common procedure. e.g. openexr propagates its private inputs (libdeflate and imath). I added a comment in vips on why those inputs are being propagated. > Since you have commit rights, please feel free to push the patches > yourself once you have made sure that all depending packages build. > > Thanks, > > Andreas > Done and pushed the series except for the last patch (will rethink it), thanks.
diff --git a/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm b/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm index 405f90ca9a..2f865e7192 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/image-processing.scm @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ (define-public vips libwebp matio niftilib - openexr-2 + openexr orc pango poppler))